Hi,
On 3 March 2013 18:45, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
You do realise it's:
a) free (for us) b) decentralised
What do you mean by it? What by free? What is decentralised?
I mean, there's no tangible cost
On 2 March 2013 16:18, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Hi!
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Stephan Richter has volunteered to do SVN to Github conversions for all
Zope
projects and has already completed all of Zope 2 core and some actively
used
projects like five.localsitemanager.
On 22 August 2012 18:30, Yusei TAHARA yu...@domen.cx wrote:
Hello,
I found a bug in ZopeSecurityPolicy and fixed it.
http://svn.zope.org/AccessControl/trunk/src/AccessControl/ZopeSecurityPolicy.py?rev=127548r1=113657r2=127548
Is it possible to release new version?
Are we sure this
On 20 August 2012 01:44, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote:
For me the discussion sounds a little like a general denial against
github using the legal story as rationale.
+10. I'm so glad others are saying the things I think need saying.
I *am* a signed ZF contributor and from
On 7 June 2012 07:20, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote:
Am 06.06.2012 um 19:58 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
[…]
As I said above, my main concern is keeping publisher events and
exception views intact. Some of these events need to happen in code
that's currently inside repoze.* middleware.
On 7 June 2012 07:20, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote:
Am 06.06.2012 um 19:58 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
[…]
As I said above, my main concern is keeping publisher events and
exception views intact. Some of these events need to happen in code
that's currently inside repoze.* middleware.
On 9 April 2012 15:41, Brian Sutherland br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 01:04:37PM -0700, Ross Patterson wrote:
experimental.broken is working well for me. It greatly aided me in
getting through a particularly nasty upgrade allowing me to cleanup the
ZCA cruft left
On 3 January 2012 08:01, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Am I right in thinking Pyramid no longer uses repoze.tm2 or a
middleware approach? What was the rationale for that design decision?
You're right, Pyramid scaffolding no longer supplies repoze.tm2 or any
other WSGI middleware
On 2 January 2012 08:50, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 01/01/2012 08:39 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
There are three known WSGI implementations of the Zope 2 publisher.
I've had a look at them and made some notes about what I think
provides the best story:
## Zope 2.13
On 2 January 2012 12:33, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
Hi Martin,
Sphinx on svn.zope.org works for me. :)
I have created a simple buildout and put it in SVN:
http://svn.zope.org/zope_secrets/
The output is shown at http://docs.zope.org/zope_secrets/ and linked from the
front
On 3 January 2012 06:39, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 10:39 +, Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 2 January 2012 08:50, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 01/01/2012 08:39 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
There are three known WSGI implementations
On 1 January 2012 09:44, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On Dec 31, 2011, at 20:09 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi folks,
I have documented some of the darker corners of Zope's internals. I
put it in the Plone developer documentation for lack of a better
place, but it's not Plone
On 1 January 2012 10:43, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
Hi Martin,
There *is* a better place, docs.zope.org. If you can tell me where the
sources are I can put it there.
Sure: Clone https://github.com/collective/collective.developermanual/
and get it from source/zope_secrets.
On 1 January 2012 10:51, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 1 January 2012 10:43, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
Hi Martin,
There *is* a better place, docs.zope.org. If you can tell me
where the sources
On 1 January 2012 11:00, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On Jan 1, 2012, at 11:46 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Where is docs.zope.org maintained?
On one of the ZF servers.
If it's going to go there, I'd like it to (a) be in version control
and (b) be somewhere that I can edit
Hi,
There are three known WSGI implementations of the Zope 2 publisher.
I've had a look at them and made some notes about what I think
provides the best story:
## Zope 2.13 WSGIPublisher
Pros:
* Allows distributed transaction management with repoze.tm2
* Allows distributed retry with
Hi folks,
I have documented some of the darker corners of Zope's internals. I
put it in the Plone developer documentation for lack of a better
place, but it's not Plone-specific:
http://collective-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/zope_secrets/index.html
Topics covered include startup,
Hi,
I found this code in PAS, which is mostly lifted from AccessControl.userfolder:
def _getObjectContext( self, v, request ):
request - ( a, c, n, v )
o 'a 'is the object the object was accessed through
o 'c 'is the physical container of the object
o 'n 'is
Hi,
AccessControl.ZopeSecurityPolicy contains this code:
from types import MethodType
# AccessControl.Implementation inserts:
# ZopeSecurityPolicy, getRoles, rolesForPermissionOn
from AccessControl.SimpleObjectPolicies import _noroles
rolesForPermissionOn = None # XXX: avoid import loop
On 17 November 2011 11:28, li...@nidelven-it.no wrote:
Hi,
I have a bunch of External Methods I'd like to make available in a skin
form, and which reload in the same way a page template would if it was
modified and the server was in debug mode.
External methods should not require restarts
Hi,
On 17 November 2011 12:25, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
Along with David Glick, I would like to volunteer for the Zope 4
release management role, where I would take responsibility for
producing the initial release of Zope 4 and David would then take over
for the maintenance
On 17 November 2011 14:46, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
Here's my current understanding of the Zope 4 roadmap.
Zope 4
--
Significant progress has already been made on the following features
and I expect they should all land in time for a Zope 4 release:
- Storing parent
On 17 November 2011 15:50, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
... (Interesting roadmap snipped)
This process will necessitate a lot of merging, so I want to propose
that we move to Git for development (something we found
On 17 November 2011 16:32, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
* Zope 4 will not seek to innovate in itself but encourage innovation
in software components shared with the wider Python web community.
I smell something funny in here: if we aren't innovating, why are we
making the
On 16 November 2011 11:30, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
Going down into the new ZMI project I find it to be the most
light-weight approach without adding an extra dependency.
What is this project? ;-)
Martin
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On 19 September 2011 14:56, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Hi!
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:57 AM, yuppiey.2011-E2EsyBC0hj3+aS/
vkh9...@public.gmane.org wrote:
Currently CMF trunk contains some hacks to work around the catalog brain
issues. But I hope
Hi,
On 17 August 2011 03:50, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
- - Land 'zope.registry' as a full ZTK package, with its own Launchpad
artifacts, etc. This step may also involve moving bugs from
zope.component to zope.registry.
This is not a major issue, but just be aware that
On 7 July 2011 12:58, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
Dear Zope Community,
on behalf of the Zope Foundation I please to announce
the relaunch of the new www.zope.org web site.
http://www.zope.org
The old zope.org site will available for the time being
in (reduced form) under
On 5 July 2011 09:42, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
What you are describing is exactly what I meant by old legacy Zope2
applications.
You should be able to use this style of development with Zope 2.13.
But you won't be able to upgrade to newer versions of Zope 2 anymore
and
On 5 July 2011 10:18, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would've thought it would also be possible for those who rely on this
to
maintain the relevant eggs as optional installations against Zope 2.x
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:19 PM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Long-term maintenance for Zope 2.13 would give these
projects/deployments at least a few more years.
Yes. I'm willing to cut releases for it for quite a
On 5 July 2011 11:10, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On 7/5/11 11:56 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichtingha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no, naming it 4.0 or
5.0 or anything else doesn't make it any better
Hi,
On 5 July 2011 11:26, Tobias Helfrich helfr...@know-it.net wrote:
Hi Hanno
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Tobias Helfrich
helfr...@know-it.net wrote:
OK, so you do think that we might use Zope 2.12 for a quite
long time
without thinking about anymore updates? Will there be
Something of a meta-comment on this thread:
It sounds like people are broadly in agreement on the direction, but not
communicating enough about what's actually going on.
I think it would be useful to keep some kind of roadmap wiki on zope.org, or
at least post to the list periodically saying,
On 3 July 2011 16:44, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Zope still needs to the virtual host monster (or something like it) even
with the WSGI publisher; there's nothing equivalent in the WSGI world
(unless
Hi,
You can use collective.beaker to manage your sessions with beaker, and
store on the filesystem (if all on the same server) or memcached (if
on different servers). That's a code change, though.
Martin
On 15 June 2011 17:50, Subish K S kssubish...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
We have 10+ Zope
On 12 June 2011 21:48, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Currently if you ask a registry to singly-adapt an object to an
interface, and the object you're trying to adapt implements that
interface, here's what happens:
from zope.component.registry import Components
c = Components()
Hi,
I just found out that, since Zope 2.12 (or 2.13?) it's no longer
possible to install a ZEO server as a Windows service. Previously, it
used to be possible to do:
bin\zeoservice install
(where bin\zeoservice is installed by plone.recipe.zeoserver), but
apparently no longer.
Is this really
Hi,
On 4 April 2011 17:30, Wolfgang Schnerring w...@gocept.com wrote:
So, how can we proceed here? Should I (and Thomas) try to get a
proof-of-concept implementation of this based on plone.testing? Or should
we think about what it takes to merge most of plone.testing's ZCA
support into
On 28 March 2011 15:45, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
The vast majority of the doctest testcases in zope.* packages fall into
this category: poor isolation, lots of edge cases which would obscure
any real narrative docs, of which there are almost none. I believe the
conflict is
Hi,
On 27 March 2011 15:54, Uli Fouquet u...@gnufix.de wrote:
The (limited) experiences with py.test, however, were awesome. Some
points that are quite cool IMHO:
- Easy finding of tests: just write some ``test_function`` in a
``test_module`` and it will be found and executed. That also
Hi Jim,
On 25 March 2011 14:12, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
Agree. There is a problem in that provideAdapter() and friends don't
use getSiteManager() - the always use the global site manager. And
there are parts of zope.component that use module level variables
directly, ignoring hooks.
Hi,
On 26 March 2011 08:11, Wolfgang Schnerring w...@gocept.com wrote:
Hello,
* Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com [2011-03-25 13:58]:
plone.testing (which is Plone non-specific and will shortly be BSD
licensed) allows for stacking of ZCA registries.
[...]
Again, plone.testing
Hi,
On 26 March 2011 14:18, Wolfgang Schnerring w...@gocept.com wrote:
Because, while test layers are nice because they have the above
properties, I'm not too happy with the current implementation, namely
the use (or is it abuse? ;-) of __bases__ and __name__, which leads
very naturally to
Hi,
On 25 March 2011 13:17, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring w...@gocept.com wrote:
Hello Uli,
I've spent quite some time thinking (and partly coding) about the same
issues you mention (but didn't feel ready to talk about it here, yet),
so
Hi,
On 20 March 2011 15:00, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
- The mechanism shouldn't require something to grok/analyze the
code. The mechanism should be explicit. This is implied by
pythonic. I remember Grok
Hi,
On 20 March 2011 15:29, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
I think you cannot avoid this, if you want to support an explicit
configuration phase. Otherwise the first import of a module could
occur at any point at runtime and have a configuration side-effect
like registering a new view.
On 9 March 2011 14:09, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 3/9/11 15:03 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net wrote:
You really want to use the ZCA for every occurance of a string-object
mapping? Really?
As long as Zope doesn't
Hi,
On 2 March 2011 08:43, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Hi!
ZPublisher.Publish and zope.publisher.publish process form inputs
differently. Zope 2 returns encoded strings unchanged if no converters
are specified. zope.publisher converts encoded strings to unicode.
One major reason
On 21 November 2010 16:16, Roger d...@projekt01.ch wrote:
Why do we use such crapy parts like omplette in z3c.form?
I never do any development whatsoever without
collective.recipe.omelette. It may not be right for z3c.form, but it's
not crappy.
Martin
Hi,
The Zope 2.12.10 KGS at
http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.10/versions.cfg specifies
lxml = 2.2.6
There is no Python 2.6 Windows build for this egg, which means that this
version cannot be installed on Windows under Python 2.6. Version 2.2.4 is
the latest version with safe binary
On 10 September 2010 14:04, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Martin Aspeli
optilude+li...@gmail.comoptilude%2bli...@gmail.com
wrote:
The Zope 2.12.10 KGS at
http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.10/versions.cfg specifies
lxml
On 10 September 2010 14:26, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Martin Aspeli
optilude+li...@gmail.comoptilude%2bli...@gmail.com
wrote:
If we *are* going to use a convenience pin, then surely the ability to
install on the world's most-used operating
On 9 September 2010 01:33, Christopher Lozinski lozin...@freerecruiting.com
wrote:
Here I am sharing my thoughts as a Zope 3.4.2 newbie.
As you have been told three times this week already: Zope 3 is in effect
dead.
You want to look at Grok (if you want less ZCML and more convention-based
Don't be too harsh on Grok/Dexterity. Dexterity has worked out how not to
repeat the definitions in interfaces, forms and content objects. It also
produces an application with suprisingly little redundant code. I urge you
to try it out. The benefits are of course quick turn around, version
Hi,
So how to make Blue Bream easier to use? I propose making the initial
start up interface a simple content management system, kind of a Plone
light.
This seems like a bad idea. Blue Bream attempts to be a development
framework, not a content management system. You are suggesting we make
Hi,
With Plone 4 and thus Zope 2.12.10, we've noticed a problem that I
think only affects Windows. Can anyone confirm or shed some more
light?
Basically, if we run an instance (installed via
plone.recipe.zope2instance as bin\instance) in the foreground
(bin\instance fg) and then kill it with
On 3 September 2010 17:06, Jim Pharis binbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm on 2.13.0a3 w/plone.recipe.zope2instanec-4.0.2. Under the scenario
Martin described, exiting a fg with ctrl-c, the lock file is cleaned up for
me. If I kill the service using Task Manager the lock file remains.
It seemed to be
Hi,
On 19 August 2010 16:46, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:15 AM, David Glick davidgl...@groundwire.org
wrote:
As an alternative to requiring calling setDefaultRoles/addPermission at
import time, I suggest that we add an optional roles attribute
On 10 August 2010 02:25, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
I've added ETag support for zope.browserresource in a branch:
http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/changeset/115596
Does anybody have any comments/objections? If not, I'd like to merge
this to trunk and release zope.browserresource 3.11.0.
Hi Jim,
On 08/08/2010, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
I have a package (plone.registry) that currently has a persistent
structure like this:
Registry(Persistent)
|
+-- Records(Persistent
On 8 August 2010 20:29, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
There should be some way of doing this with custom __getstate__ and
__setstate__ methods.
It's just tricky to get right and a bit fragile. It's much easier to
write the migration code if both the old and new class are
Hi,
[I posted this to zodb-dev, but it seems that list isn't working at
the moment(?) so I thought I'd try here too]
I have a package (plone.registry) that currently has a persistent
structure like this:
Registry(Persistent)
|
+-- Records(Persistent)
|
+-- BTree of
On 2 August 2010 22:40, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 16:36 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday, August 02, 2010, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
'll have to look at that. Currently, the documentation builder does not
do any
On 29 July 2010 19:26, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Hi!
Traditionally the last two lines of unit test files look like this:
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main(defaultTest='test_suite')
That makes it easy to run the tests of a specific file. But it doesn't
work with
On 29 July 2010 20:14, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
I never do either. I install zc.recipe.testrunner in a buildout and
use bin/test, which picks up tests in modules automatically.
Sure. But do you always run all tests it picks up while working on a
specific
On 29 July 2010 22:35, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I don't believe that zope.testing's testrunner works without 'def
test_suite()'.
Latter versions can detect unittest.TestCase-derived test suites
automatically. For doctests you still need test_suite().
Martin
Hi,
On 25 July 2010 16:58, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
A while back, I wrote collective.xmltestreport [1,2]. In short, it's a
wrapper around zope.testing's test runner that can produce output
Hi,
A while back, I wrote collective.xmltestreport [1,2]. In short, it's a
wrapper around zope.testing's test runner that can produce output in
an XML format compatible with the xUnit family of testing tools. This
is useful for integrating with things like Hudson, which can parse
these kinds of
Log message for revision 114489:
Correct the past.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
--- Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst 2010-07-10 10:00:41 UTC (rev 114488)
Log message for revision 114490:
Merge r114488 from 2.12 branch
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/Products/Five/browser/metaconfigure.py
U Zope/trunk/src/Products/Five/browser/tests/pages.txt
U Zope/trunk/src/Products/Five/browser/tests/pages.zcml
-=-
Modified:
On 27 June 2010 00:24, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Hi there,
recently MJ opened a security related bug and disclosed it to the
public at https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/578326.
In short Zope 2 never supported the permission attribute on ZCML
browser:view declarations.
On 10 July 2010 18:16, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Martin Aspeli
optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed in r114488 (2.12 branch) and r114490 (trunk). I don't think I'm
allowed to close the issue on Launchpad, but it should be fine now.
Awesome
On 9 July 2010 16:12, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ideally I'd love to add support for the permission attribute, as
clearly people have been using it. But if there's nobody who can
figure out how
Hi Hanno,
On 27 June 2010 00:24, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Hi there,
recently MJ opened a security related bug and disclosed it to the
public at https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/578326.
In short Zope 2 never supported the permission attribute on ZCML
browser:view
On 1 July 2010 21:10, Godefroid Chapelle got...@bubblenet.be wrote:
Le 01/07/10 14:53, Stephan Richter a écrit :
On Thursday, July 01, 2010, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
I found http://docs.zope.org/z3c.form/
Last updated Nov 08,2009 Version 1.8.2dev.
What is the process to get the latest
Log message for revision 112780:
Fix processInputs() so that it no longer stomps on things like :records or
:int:list
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
U Zope/branches/2.12/src/Products/Five/browser/decode.py
U
Log message for revision 112781:
Merge c112780 from 2.12 branch
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/Products/Five/browser/decode.py
U Zope/trunk/src/Products/Five/browser/tests/test_decode.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/Products/Five/browser/decode.py
On 15 May 2010 15:39, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 5/10/10 17:24 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I fixed a few issues in z3c.form today. Can anyone make a 2.3.4 release?
Since I got no reaction I'll repeat this request: can someone please
make a new z3c.form release? Looking at
On 4 May 2010 00:09, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Hanno is making releases of packages in the ZTK. So it's not just
Hanno's waste of time; it's mine too. That's where I was coming from
when this discussion started. It didn't help that the action of making
the fork really hurt
On 20 April 2010 21:23, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 13:44, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
You may want to move it outside the zope.* namespace to encourage that :)
-1
I think zope.testrunner is just fine, and acknowledges the heritage.
Namespaces
Hi Christian,
On 21 April 2010 02:58, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
On 04/20/2010 08:44 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Christian Theunec...@gocept.com wrote:
Minor note: zope.testing *promotes* layers the wrong way and
zope.app.testing definitely
On 18 April 2010 05:20, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I'm not against having the snippets be executable, because I *do* want
them to work. I just don't want to encourage anyone to think that they
are testing the software when they write the snippets, or execute them.
Executing
Hi Lennart co,
On 17 April 2010 02:38, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 19:53, Jonathan Lange j...@mumak.net wrote:
As the author of one of those other testrunners, I can tell you that
if you do this you'll find that your number one biggest problem is
getting
On 17 April 2010 09:41, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This kind of goes with Lennart's frustration about trying to port the
ZTK packages, or a core subset, to Python 3.
I would like to see the ZTK packages have really excellent
Log message for revision 110799:
Apply some safety to the fix in r110185 after reports it may be causing some
problems
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/src/Products/Five/browser/resource.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.12/src/Products/Five/browser/resource.py
Log message for revision 110800:
Merge c110799 from svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/2.12
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/Products/Five/browser/resource.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/Products/Five/browser/resource.py
Log message for revision 110660:
A hint for the next person who gets very confused when importing something a
second time doesn't work.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/ZServer/PubCore/__init__.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/ZServer/PubCore/__init__.py
Hi,
I'd like to come up with a way to set up a test fixture that does the
component registry equivalent of stackable DemoStorage's: whilst a layer
is in effect, calls to provideAdapter() and friends (and ZCML execution)
go into a global registry that is stacked on top of the default global
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Marius Gedminas wrote:
Someone (I'm bad with names, sorry!) recently proposed a change to
zope.configuration that makes ZCML directives use getSiteManager()
instead of getGlobalSiteManager(); with that patch in, Chris's example
should make
Chris McDonough wrote:
On 4/8/10 4:36 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
from zope.component import getSiteManager
getSiteManager.sethook(get_current_registry)
That seems a bit short-sighted: it would break all tests that rely on
setSite() working.
He said he wanted a global registry, but.. who
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Yes, I did look at it. However, the real goal is to provide isolation
for anything that makes ZCA registrations. In particular, that
includes provideAdapter() and friends. I suspect z3c.baseregistry can't
deal
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Can you elaborate on what you mean here?
So I think this can all be done independently of base registry (unless you are
are planning to store the registry in the ZODB).
The key for layering is the ability to inherit
Fred Drake wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
So this is still in pyexpat C code as far as I can tell. :-(
This is saddening.
But on the other hand, your dedication in helping me find a fix is
heartening. ;)
I've not managed a 64-bit
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is a Python issue or a zope issue. We're getting a
segfault on 64-bit SuSE Linux (SLES 11), originating from
z3c.autoinclude, which in turn called zope.configuration'sinclude /
implementation. This calls expat, which then crashes (no error, log
Martin Aspeli wrote:
At this point, something is printed to the console. collective.wtf is a
dependency of lw.portal, and its ZCML is being included from lw.portal.
/home/osc/osc/eggs/collective.wtf-1.0b9-py2.6.egg/collective/wtf/exportimport.py:8:
DeprecationWarning: InitializeClass
Hi,
Has anyone given any thought to supporting the new constructs of
unittest2 (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/unittest2) in zope.testing?
Using zope.testing 3.9.3 and a simple test case with unittest2, I made
the following observations:
- A basic test case works fine; a subclass of
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
What's the next step? I'd love to see some roadmapping ala that you did
for Plone 5, in particular to discuss our WSGI story (which I'm
interested in helping out with if others can help
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is a Python issue or a zope issue. We're getting a
segfault on 64-bit SuSE Linux (SLES 11), originating from
z3c.autoinclude, which in turn called zope.configuration's include /
implementation. This calls expat, which then crashes (no error, log
message, or core file,
Fred Drake wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Any tips on how to debug or similar experiences would be appreciated!
If you're on some Unix flavor, you should be able to deconstruct the
return code from the runzope process to determine if the
1 - 100 of 482 matches
Mail list logo
