Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-16 Thread Chris Kratz
versions of zope, but our deep zope fu isn't up to the challenge (nor do we have a lot of time). And it seems that low level stuff for zodb storage's change with every release (as shane noted in his eol announcement). -Chris -- Chris Kratz ___ Zope

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-16 Thread Chris Kratz
On Thursday 16 March 2006 12:18 pm, Paul Winkler wrote: On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 11:00:11AM -0500, Chris Kratz wrote: Now, if using svn for source control is the only reason he was using APE, surely you'd agree that DirecotyViews are a more appropriate method? cheers, Chris

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-14 Thread Chris Kratz
:( J.F. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Kratz Sent: March 13, 2006 3:07 PM To: zope@zope.org Subject: Re: [Zope] Re: Ape On Saturday 11 March 2006 11:16 am, Shane Hathaway wrote: Dennis Allison wrote: I am looking

Re: [Zope] Re: Ape

2006-03-13 Thread Chris Kratz
On Saturday 11 March 2006 11:16 am, Shane Hathaway wrote: Dennis Allison wrote: I am looking to map a portion of the local file system into Zope. One way to do this is to use LocalFS, another is to use Ape. I am sure there are onter approaches as well. We are using Zop 2.9.X. Will Ape

[Zope-dev] apelib performance

2005-07-13 Thread Chris Kratz
Hello All, Our application contains about 38k objects running via apelib into the filesystem using the filesystem mapper. We have been extremely happy with the ability to use version control on everything in zope which apelib affords us as well as allowing our developers to use editors/ide of