Re: [Zope-dev] Recursive search of dependencies in z3c.autoinclude

2011-04-13 Thread Ethan Jucovy
Hey, These sound good to me, as long as they're off by default, have tests, and don't break existing behavior. includeDependencies package=. recursive=True ignore=zope.app.zcmlfiles ice.control / This not include packages `zope.app.zcmlfiles` and `ice.control`, but include their

Re: [Zope-dev] New Zope 3 name: BlueBream

2010-01-06 Thread Ethan Jucovy
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Hermann Himmelbauer du...@qwer.tk wrote: +1 on just bream from an interested bystander.  Somehow the blue makes me think of microsoft. Microsoft, really? I guess it's some blurred combination of the blue color schemes I always associate with Windows, and the

Re: [Zope-dev] New Zope 3 name: BlueBream

2010-01-05 Thread Ethan Jucovy
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Stephan Richter srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote: On Monday 04 January 2010, Baiju M wrote: I am proposing to call Zope 3 - the web frame work as BlueBream. The main use for name is documentation. But the package named bluebream will not

Re: [Zope-dev] A summary of Interfaces vs ZCA concepts

2009-12-18 Thread Ethan Jucovy
Hi, On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 08:51, Brian Sutherland br...@vanguardistas.net wrote: I like things to fail noisily and loudly unconfigured and give good information about what's wrong. +1 [snip] we make zope.interface

Re: [Zope-dev] A summary of Interfaces vs ZCA concepts

2009-12-17 Thread Ethan Jucovy
Hi, On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote: * It'd be nice if __call__ came back with a LookupError instead of a TypeError, but how to get from A to B without breakage? Maybe I've misunderstanding, but what's the advantage of making IFoo(x) raise a

Re: [Zope-dev] dropping Python 2.4 support in the Zope Toolkit?

2009-05-05 Thread Ethan Jucovy
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.comoptilude%2bli...@gmail.com wrote: Lennart Regebro wrote: Can you expand on this argument, because I don't understand it. Zope 2.10 doesn't stop working because Zope 2.12 no longer supports Python 2.4. And you are not

Re: [Zope-dev] How can I force the language for a particular template rendering?

2009-04-17 Thread Ethan Jucovy
How about just monkeypatching the active negotiator? {{{ negotiator = getUtility(zope.i18n.interfaces.INegotiator) orig = negotiator.getLanguage negotiator.getLanguage = lambda foo, bar: 'fr' text = my_page_template() negotiator.getLanguage = orig }}} Haven't tested it, but in my (limited)

Re: [Zope-dev] How can I force the language for a particular template rendering?

2009-04-17 Thread Ethan Jucovy
interface, and mark the current request with IForceLanguage before rendering the template. egj On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Ethan Jucovy ethan.juc...@gmail.comwrote: How about just monkeypatching the active negotiator? {{{ negotiator = getUtility(zope.i18n.interfaces.INegotiator) orig

Re: [Zope-dev] How can I force the language for a particular template rendering?

2009-04-17 Thread Ethan Jucovy
interface, and mark the current request with IForceLanguage before rendering the template. egj On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Ethan Jucovy ethan.juc...@gmail.comwrote: How about just monkeypatching the active negotiator? {{{ negotiator = getUtility(zope.i18n.interfaces.INegotiator) orig

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: merge zc.configuration's exclude directive into zope.configuration.

2009-03-02 Thread Ethan Jucovy
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote: Also, is there any caching for already processed packages in the include finder code? If no, I'd probably like to contribute some, if I'll use z3c.autoinclude. :) Ah, you're thinking in the same direction. I don't

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: merge zc.configuration's exclude directive into zope.configuration.

2009-02-28 Thread Ethan Jucovy
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote: Hey, On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Ethan Jucovy ethan.juc...@gmail.com wrote: That's true on paper, but in practice z3c.autoinclude's *indirection* does make a difference when you're just trying to debug what's

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: merge zc.configuration's exclude directive into zope.configuration.

2009-02-26 Thread Ethan Jucovy
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote: Hey, On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Dan Korostelev nad...@gmail.com wrote: Yep, I know about z3c.autoinclude, but I don't like it, as it makes things more implicit and it also Yes, automation makes things more

Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.autoinclude doesn't include extra_requires

2008-12-06 Thread Ethan Jucovy
Hey Christian, I finally had a bit of time to sort out my Zope.org SVN credentials and try to look into this ... but I'm actually not getting very far. What I'm stumped on: is there any way to find out which extras have been installed with a package? The details: The bad line is

[Zope-dev] Re: Buildout site

2008-07-17 Thread Ethan Jucovy
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just FYI, the final resting place for this information will likely be inside a more general documentation website, the address buildout.zope.org is just a temporary resting place. Just to make a discussion Jens and I