On Sunday 18 February 2007 08:24, Marco Bizzarri wrote:
On 2/17/07, Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007, Marco Bizzarri wrote:
Hi all.
I'm looking for an alternative to python gdchart for barchart/piechart
in a web application. I'm looking to python gdchart 2,
On Sunday 09 July 2006 22:56, Jim Fulton wrote:
Whoever integrated reST didn't even read the documentation, much less
the code.
FWIW.
The ZReST product was originally released by me around 2002 - before those
directives existed. According to the docutils HISTORY file, the directives
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 18:12, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 28 Jun 2006, at 03:24, Richard Jones wrote:
I've got a zopectl script I'm trying to run with the zopectl run
command. It
crashes out with a ConflictError even if there are no other ZEO
clients
connected to the ZEO store. I've
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 18:31, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Are you using persistent ZEO caches? Those have been known to cause
odd symptoms here and there...
What do you mean by persistent? I have noticed strange beahviours if I don't
remove the caches when I do a full (client + server) restart.
On Thursday 29 June 2006 06:13, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Richard Jones wrote at 2006-6-28 11:24 +1000:
it crashes out with a ConflictError even if there are no other ZEO clients
connected to the ZEO store.
Usually, a ConflictError does not crash Zope...
Sure, we requests are retried, but zopectl
I've got a zopectl script I'm trying to run with the zopectl run command. It
crashes out with a ConflictError even if there are no other ZEO clients
connected to the ZEO store. I've restarted the ZEO store, no change.
Any advice? Ideas?
Richard
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 11:35, you wrote:
Which Zope are you using? Set the logging level to BLATHER and try
running with runzope rather than zopectl and see what happens. The
event log should help localize the problem. Be sure to check both the
ZEO logs and the Zope logs.
Also, it
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 02:11, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Monday 02 January 2006 08:10, Jake wrote:
I sent this out last year and thought it would be fun to see how
Zope's did in 2005.
Pages:6,580,999
Hits: 37,137,283
Bandwidth: 142.12 GB
Hardware: AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 2.0Ghz, 2GB
I'm migrating our 2.7-developed Product to 2.8. The following change has me
puzzled. In 2.7, AccessControl.ZopeGuards guarded_getitem has the following
code:
def guarded_getitem(object, index):
[ snip handling of slices ]
...
v = object[index]
if Containers(type(object)) and
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:00 am, Richard Jones wrote:
I'm migrating our 2.7-developed Product to 2.8. The following change has me
puzzled. In 2.7, AccessControl.ZopeGuards guarded_getitem has the
following code:
OK, Tres made the change, with the relevant bit of the log message being
I can't instantiate out Product, which is a bit of a hurdle :)
Our Product's registration looks like this (this function is invoked from the
Product's __init__.py):
def initialize(context):
''' Register the CGPublisher class '''
context.registerClass(
CGPublisher,
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 04:36 am, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Does your addValue have a __name__ attribute with value addValue?
In py2.3 (at least) functions get a __name__ automatically:
Python 2.3.5 (#2, Mar 29 2005, 15:41:06)
[GCC 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-8ubuntu2)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:06 pm, Richard Jones wrote:
and now everything works.
Further data-point - the version of VerboseSecurity is to blame. It's not
2.8-compatible :(
Sorry for the noise.
Richard
pgpvvxmwsl89Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:04 pm, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
Shane Graber wrote:
I'm looking for an e-commerce solution for Zope / Plone. My specific
requirements are that we want to make available files for download that
customers would have to pay for before they could download them. Does
I'd like to get session-based login going, and on the surface PAS appears to
support that.
First up, is there any documentation?
I've set up in my PAS acl_users the following objects:
1. cookies - a Cookie Auth Helper active for Challenge
2. session - a Session Auth Helper active for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 03:23 pm, Richard Jones wrote:
Has anyone else seen ZPsycopgDA just lose its connection?
I just looked in Shared/DC/ZRDB/Connection.py
If the connection string is empty (which is quite valid for my setup, as it
turns out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 12:09 pm, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
- If you want to access a anonymous page, you will *not* be sending
auth credentials.
Why do you say that? Cooke auth doesn't distinguish between anonymous pages
and pages that require a user,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Has anyone else seen ZPsycopgDA just lose its connection? I've got two ZEO
clients set up to use it, and every now and then one of them (the primary)
just up and loses its connection. There doesn't appear to be any message in
the log file *except*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 05:54 pm, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Bakhtiar A Hamid wrote:
Richard Jones wrote:
http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/ZSQLSessionDataManager
ark!
insufficient priveleges
Works now !
Well, it does *sometimes*. Whenever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:21 am, Tres Seaver wrote:
Richard Jones wrote:
Yeah, I remember poking around that code way back, and it seemed
reasonable. Its interactions with transactions are the bits that scare
me. Using a standard RDBMS connection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:47 am, Fernando Lujan wrote:
Isn't there a easy way to do this? I was wondering if I couldn just
createa new filestorage entry in the zeo.conf, and add some lines in my
zope.conf file.
Is there a viable non-versioned
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:44 am, you wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 19:08, Richard Jones wrote:
Is there a viable non-versioned alternative to the filestorage approach?
My sessions database grows ridiculously quickly. I'm also fairly sure
it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 02:49 am, Jim Fulton wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
i.e. will I still write:
security.declareProtected(SomePermission, 'foo')
def foo(self):
...
That will work, and I don't see a need to deprecate it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:30 am, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
- declaring object security on the acquiree via
declareObjectProtected(foo)
For me, the problem arises when the acquiree is a Python builtin object - a
string instance attribute in my case.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 05:26 pm, Richard Jones wrote:
That is, there's no acquisition context on the simple string. To fix the
problem, I changed secure_url to be a ComputedAttribute which looked up the
instance attribute _secure_url. This then gave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 06:54 am, Aruna Kathiria wrote:
I did some work regarding SOAP support on ZOPE and published this
document on zope.org.
Is there really no interest in getting SOAP support into the Zope core?
I've got a guy working on some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:29 pm, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
On 22.10.2004, at 14:38, Tres Seaver wrote:
Given that the change was required to implement a security fix, and
without a reproducible test case for the reported breakage, I don't
think we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:03 am, Tres Seaver wrote:
Richard Jones reported an issue with the patch, but couldn't give us a
simple case. Users who *have* such weird applications can reverse the
patch, find workarounds, or whatever, until they can help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/10/2004, at 4:33 PM, Santi Camps wrote:
Yes, meta_type is an attribute of type string, but I don't understand
your reasons. Acquisition, obviously, is not implemented in strings,
but if the object containing meta_type attribute inherits from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:23 am, Gerry Kirk wrote:
A user got this error trying to edit content. It only happened once, and
on second try she was ok. Using Zope 2.7.0:
2.7.3 (currently beta, but live on our production server) fixes errors of this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:40 am, Chris McDonough wrote:
Would you be able to write a short test case that demonstrates the
failure mode that you're seeing in your existing code? It would be nice
to understand the failure before blindly reenabling the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:14 pm, Chris McDonough wrote:
Alright, well, in the meantime, I think we're going to release the beta
with the aq_acquire DWIM removed and if it causes other folks problems
we'll be able to tell from folks using the beta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/09/2004, at 1:00 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
I'd just stick the code back in there for now and we'll see what Tres
says.
No word from Tres, 2.7 branch release coming up...
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[might dupe - sent the first copy of this from the wrong address, sorry!]
I've just upgraded to use the bleeding-edge 2-7 branch (from 2.7.2, running in
py 2.3.3) and I've started getting permission problems with attributes. The
cause appears to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:15 pm, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 21:18, Richard Jones wrote:
On the proposals object though, we don't have any delaration for the
secure_url attribute. If I add one, or a general
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:36 pm, Chris McDonough wrote:
Yep, that's the situation. It appears to look for the security assertions
for secure_url on A instead of B. Note that secure_url is an
attribute of B.
Yup. IOW, it looks like it used to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 01:00 pm, Chris McDonough wrote:
I'd just stick the code back in there for now and we'll see what Tres
says.
This is what I've done to speed up my testing, rather than fixing all the
places stuff is broken. I'll be testing for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 03:30 am, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Moreover, I propose to change the local role management pages.
When setting local roles, information about acquired
local role definitions is very helpful.
I therefore propose to display this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 24 Apr 2004 09:13, Andre Meyer wrote:
- Commenting/uncommenting code (any hope Python will ever offer
multi-line comments?).
'''
this_code_is_commented_out()
so_is_this()
'''
Well, there is certainly more, but this is a start... ;-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 02 Apr 2004 18:44, Chris Withers wrote:
Ah, okay, I think building something purely for CSS would REALLY suck.
Something which could generically build SQL, CSS, Emails I would be less
lielyl to vomit about...
[snip]
So persuade the
On Saturday 21 February 2004 06:04, Casey Duncan wrote:
This is indeed possible. getObject swallows all errors and returns None
when one occurs. This would make it return None on busy systems if the
traversal during getObject raised a read ConflictError.
This would indeed result in the
On Friday 20 February 2004 05:52, Dieter Maurer wrote:
We have a report for Zope 2.7 about an object magically turning
into None (1 or 2 weeks ago).
Sorry, I haven't been following this thread, but I will note that I've seen
(repeatably) in my test Zope environment this behaviour.
This is
On Thursday 12 February 2004 01:23, Casey Duncan wrote:
What kinds of requests are these? Do they all require a dynamic output?
If not, then you should put better caching in front of Zope, or at a
minimum tweak you caching headers so that some could be served as 304s
for instance.
If they
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:25 pm, Richard Jones wrote:
1. request comes in which modifies ZODB
2. code handling request replies with REQUEST.RESPONSE.redirect()
3. redirected page uses data input at step 1 (specifically, it's auth info)
but that info hasn't been committed yet, so we get errors
I'm seeing the following behaviour in Zope2.7b2 (python 2.3.2) on a relatively
fast computer (Athlon 1.8GHz):
1. request comes in which modifies ZODB
2. code handling request replies with REQUEST.RESPONSE.redirect()
3. redirected page uses data input at step 1 (specifically, it's auth info)
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 06:16 am, Evan Simpson wrote:
OK, I've checked in a sample implementation on evan-pathprefix-branch.
It allows for registering prefixes with:
This seems very nice. I'm not likely to actually have a chance to play with it
any time soon though, so I can't really comment on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, July 5, 2003, at 04:50 AM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Richard Jones wrote at 2003-7-1 12:03 +1000:
...
PageTemplateFile (via Script and SimpleItem) inherits Item. This class
has an attribute id set to '' by default. PageTemplateFiles don't
use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PageTemplateFiles don't have an id attribute set when they're created
- - they have a __name__ instead. This causes functions like
getPhysicalPath (and the related absolute_url) to break in fun ways :)
The SimpleItem.Item_w__name__ mixin was created
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In my last email, I said Also, is there a reason why Item_w__name__
doesn't define getId() when it does define _setId()? This question
doesn't really capture the essence of the problem. In a nutshell, the
following happened...
PageTemplateFile (via
On Friday 20 June 2003 04:57 pm, PieterB wrote:
On Friday 20 June 2003 01:19 am, Jean Jordaan wrote:
There's only one possible way! A-A-P! (A good match for Ape, Shane ;)
It's a replacement for make by Bram Moolenaar, the author of Vim, and
it looks like it does a lot of things Right.
On Friday 20 June 2003 01:19 am, Jean Jordaan wrote:
There's only one possible way! A-A-P! (A good match for Ape, Shane ;)
It's a replacement for make by Bram Moolenaar, the author of Vim, and
it looks like it does a lot of things Right.
Sorry, I haven't really been paying attention so this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 06:17 AM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
- Use ZEO. It makes starting/stopping Zope much faster and isolates
the application from the database.
I've noticed that this pattern doesn't hold with Zope 2.7 as it
currently stands. Even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 04:38 AM, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
[Please followup to zodb-dev.]
You made some changes to the mkzeoinst.py script in April. I was busy
then, and I've just had a chance to look at the changes now. I'd like
to discuss some
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 1:26 am, Kevin Smith wrote:
This works!! Thank you! Do you keep your Page Templates up-to-date
with Zope's, or is this version going to stay the way it is from now
on? It looks like you did what I was trying to do (i.e. put a wrapper
around the existing code) so that
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 1:53 am, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Hurm. I can't answer this directly, but I have done the same as you and
divorced ZPT completely from Zope for Roundup. See http://roundup.sf.net/
in the roundup.cgi.[PageTemplates|TAL|ZTUtils] packages.
I wonder if it would be worth our
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:07 am, Kevin Smith wrote:
I am trying to make a stand-alone Page Templates packages that doesn't
have any Zope dependencies. I was able to short circuit security and
acquisition. I re-implemented MultiMapping in plain Python and made
the Base class just an empty class.
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 6:07 am, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
CallProfiler wasn't profiling ZPTs because they've been renamed/moved
from Products.PageTemplates.PageTemplates.PageTemplates to
Products.PageTemplates.ZopePageTemplate.ZopePageTemplate. Here's a patch
to make it work again.
I'll
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 1:23 pm, Simon Michael wrote:
Simon Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The doc I read listed a large number of rules, including many that seemed
to want to exert more control over my text than they should. (I had a
I tracked it down - it was the example rST PEP posted in
[courtesy cc send to David G, so if I make any blatantly errneous statements
he can come chase me with the Big Stick :)]
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 8:01 pm, Max M wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I would be fine to have reStructuredText inside the Zope core (for 2.7)
and to deprecate the current
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 02:02, Lennart Regebro wrote:
I want a *good* mail program. :-/
I recommend KMail for those who prefer a GUI reader.
http://kmail.kde.org/
It boasts an impressive list of features, including the invaluable SSL POP and
SMTP connections and really well-integrated
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:29, Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:30:56 +1100, Richard Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm investigating why our product ZODB is growing when it shouldn't. I've
found that the undo log has entries in it every five minutes saying
Installed product
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:27, Richard Jones wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:29, Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:30:56 +1100, Richard Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm investigating why our product ZODB is growing when it shouldn't.
I've found that the undo log has entries
I'm investigating why our product ZODB is growing when it shouldn't. I've
found that the undo log has entries in it every five minutes saying
Installed product CallProfiler by Zope. More infrequently (not regularly)
we also have Installed product ZOracleDA by Zope.
The Call Profiler was
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 08:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How extensively is STX actually used? I've been looking at it myself
recently, and the whole system seem rather simplistic to me in how it
parses the text. I'm talking specifically of the STX version currently
standard in Zope 2.5 (and 2.4
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002 07:20, Brian Lloyd wrote:
Seb wrote:
Pros - a tiny performance gain
Cons - unpredictable interaction with future products; not a well-known
method of distributing products; not easily discoverable
What if, instead of the static list of callable info that the CP
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002 10:54, Adrian Hungate wrote:
The call profiler seems to be a very popular feature, and it seems to
provide very useful information. It's not rock solid yet (I am sure I even
remember it's author saying this a day or so ago)
Any idea what I might have been referring to? I
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 21:25, seb bacon wrote:
Absolutely ... and I would also like to see Richards excellent Call
Profiler service become part of the core.
I'm definitely putting the profiler into 2.6 - there's just an open
question of where it gets put. The question was asked on
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 14:40, Casey Duncan wrote:
I agree, monkey patches are perfect for this. That
makes them totally transparent to the application and
Zope for that matter. There's nothing wrong with them
in the right application.
My main concern is the use of monkeypatching in the core
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 15:17, Eric Roby wrote:
Let's get a discussion
started to define 2.6
I'd like to see the ZSyncer Product, or a variant thereof, included in
Zope by default. That is, I'd like Synchronization, to a be a default
property of Zope objects, so that
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:53, seb bacon wrote:
Hi!
It wouldn't surprise me - ZPT has the roughly the same overheads as DTML
for the language parsing, but a presentation template goes through an
HTML parser in addition - which is always going to be quite slow in
python.
That's only during
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002 21:42, seb bacon wrote:
On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 21:58, Richard Jones wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:53, seb bacon wrote:
I wrote:
I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the
zope announce list (waiting for people in different timezones
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:53, seb bacon wrote:
I wrote:
I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the zope
announce list (waiting for people in different timezones to authorise
them :) ( http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/CallProfiler/ for the
impatient)
This is
I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the zope
announce list (waiting for people in different timezones to authorise them :)
( http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/CallProfiler/ for the impatient)
In a nutshell, it patches the rendering guts of DTMLMethod, ZSQL, etc.
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:10, Anthony Baxter wrote:
Richard Jones wrote
I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the zope
announce list (waiting for people in different timezones to authorise
them :) ( http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/CallProfiler
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 04:01, Chris Withers wrote:
Richard Jones wrote:
plug
http://roundup.sf.net/
... is in heavy development, but is also being used right now.
/plug
Well, it's written in Python, so probably a good candidate.
Could it be integrated into Zope
On Saturday 01 December 2001 02:29, Magnus Heino wrote:
3. We could use another open source tool. Bugzilla springs to
mind. Yes, it's not Zope, or even python, but it does
work, certainly better than anything we, as a community, have
right now or could build in the time it would take to
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 19:49, Danny William Adair wrote:
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 18:41, Richard Jones wrote:
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 16:34, Danny William Adair wrote:
As from what I know (leaving aside for a moment that I basically know
nothing), Zope should
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 15:12, Danny William Adair wrote:
I wondered if this (see subject) was totally necessary during the
installation. My Zope installation seems to run fine when I delete all the
*.pyc and just start it. Obviously it runs slower the first time, but
that's all I can
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 16:34, Danny William Adair wrote:
As from what I know (leaving aside for a moment that I basically know
nothing), Zope should be _started_ as root, but then be _running_ as
nobody. This does make sense to me, in a couple of ways. :-)
Do you know when or where
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 22:00, R. David Murray wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, John Ziniti wrote:
Yeah ... something tells me it's a little more complicated than that.
Like recompiling the kernel, quite possibly. On FreeBSD there's
a sysctl, although you may still have to recompile the
[cc'ed to zope-dev so people can check this information]
On Thursday 04 October 2001 13:47, Joseph Wayne Norton wrote:
One related question that I have regarding cgi.py and zope.
Would there be any compatibility problem of applying the following
older cgi hotfix to python's cgi.py file and
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 04:50, John Ziniti wrote:
DIAGNOSIS:
It appears that this only happens when the form is specified with
enctype=multipart/form-data. In that case, Zope (or, more accurately,
the cgi module), tries to create temporary file for each form input,
no matter what type
On Friday 28 September 2001 22:05, Paul Everitt wrote:
Whew, what a proposal and what a good sign!
As several have noted, there are quite a few proposals in the fishbowl
that deal with different aspects of the problems. There's also a draft
proposal that we had here in ZC that expands on
On Thursday 27 September 2001 00:37, Simon Coles wrote:
But of course at the moment we have to get them to:
- install Zope
- get, expand, and install the CMF (which is distributed as a .tgz,
rather confounding Windows users)
- get our product and expand/install
I've just created the follwing fishbowl proposal:
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/BatteriesIncludedDistribution
Please read and comment.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 16:26, Adrian Hungate wrote:
I have to disagree about the Zope (%s), I have been known to run 2 or 3
Zope services, for different instances, and I always know that I can find
them all huddled together at the bottom of the Service Manager - Very
useful.
So does
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 16:41, Adrian Hungate wrote:
I edit the registry... One of my many favourite pass-times, right up there
with running out in traffic.
Seriously though, once an instance is configured, why would you want to
change it? (Assuming you get it right that is)
Mostly the
We've got a wonderful zope control panel (which installs into the standard
windows Control Panel) and zope service which we'll be making available in
binary and source form this week. Like the Mac OS X controller, this is
simply a trivial re-branding extension of our work in supporting the
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 14:23, Andy wrote:
We'd like to propose that the service distributed with Zope move over to
using our code.
Great, Im really looking forward to an improved Windows installation. But
lets get it out there play with it before anything major happens like
shipping
man-years
in the code, and we're not about to just give that away. Our investors would
string us up!
Richard
--
Richard Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Developer, Bizar Software (www.bizarsoftware.com.au)
___
Zope-Dev maillist
to find the bad except: and submit a patch...
Richard
--
Richard Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Developer, Bizar Software (www.bizarsoftware.com.au)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
As the subject says, REQUEST.set('n', n+1) is broken on zope.org. The
following DTML will raise an AttributeError on __add__:
dtml-call REQUEST.set('n', 1)
dtml-call REQUEST.set('n', n+1)
Is this a permanent change and is this going into the Zope codebase?
Richard
--
Richard Jones
92 matches
Mail list logo
