Re: [Zope] Does anyone care whether we deprecate Your Favourite Part of Zope

2005-04-07 Thread David H
Andrew Milton wrote:
I think people on this list need to realize that eventually, the direction of
any significantly large Open Source project is hijacked by the relatively
small number of people actually doing the work.
The reasons for this are many-fold, but, normally come down to a lack of
communication between the developers and the users, which is realized in a
lack of understanding by the developers of what the users want.
This for the most part isn't generally a problem, until, the developers start
to do things for the user's own good, like remove features that are
kludgey, or a hack, or insert some other reason, which generally means
either noone wants to work on it, or some other change caused it to break, and
noone wants to fix it.
Now to the credit of the Zope guys, they actually poll the users to find out,
rather than just announce the demise of something. However, in general once 
you add a feature, you can be guaranteed, that somewhere, someone is using 
it, so removing it will always cause a problem. So there will always be an
uproar when you poll.

You're never going to be able to reduce the feature set between point
releases without upsetting some group of people. So why don't we stop all this
nonsense now, and just agree, that you're never going to do that d8) You have
Zope 3 to remove all the stuff you hate d8)
In my opinion if you change something, it's your responsibility to fix the
resulting breakage. That's part of your responsibiliity to the rest of the
community (i.e. the [mostly non-paying] customers). If you don't think you
have this responsibility to us, then you should work on your own version of
Zope, where you're not impacting anyone else.
For the record, I hate ZClasses... d8)
 

I wish Terri Shiavo had as much compassion as ZClasses.
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] Does anyone care whether we deprecate Your Favourite Part of Zope

2005-04-07 Thread Phillip Hutchings
flame

What gives us the right to dictate what features these people give up
their time to work on? Sure, Zope (the company) pays some, but others
seem to do it for no direct reward, other than the Zope program.
end flame

I admire these people, I have no idea what goes through Zope, though I
might look at fixing some bugs and submitting patches to see what's
involved.

If you love the feature so much, either make it work yourself, or pay
someone to.

I do sympathise those who have spent time creating and maintaining
solutions based on ZClasses, and I hope someone comes up with a system
to export them to a product. I started with python scripts and then a
product. Basic products are simple and development can be quite fast
with refreshing turned on.
-- 
Phillip Hutchings
http://www.sitharus.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] Does anyone care whether we deprecate Your Favourite Part of Zope

2005-04-07 Thread Garito
David H escribió:
Andrew Milton wrote:
I think people on this list need to realize that eventually, the 
direction of
any significantly large Open Source project is hijacked by the 
relatively
small number of people actually doing the work.

The reasons for this are many-fold, but, normally come down to a lack of
communication between the developers and the users, which is realized 
in a
lack of understanding by the developers of what the users want.

This for the most part isn't generally a problem, until, the 
developers start
to do things for the user's own good, like remove features that are
kludgey, or a hack, or insert some other reason, which 
generally means
either noone wants to work on it, or some other change caused it to 
break, and
noone wants to fix it.

Now to the credit of the Zope guys, they actually poll the users to 
find out,
rather than just announce the demise of something. However, in 
general once you add a feature, you can be guaranteed, that 
somewhere, someone is using it, so removing it will always cause a 
problem. So there will always be an
uproar when you poll.

You're never going to be able to reduce the feature set between point
releases without upsetting some group of people. So why don't we stop 
all this
nonsense now, and just agree, that you're never going to do that d8) 
You have
Zope 3 to remove all the stuff you hate d8)

In my opinion if you change something, it's your responsibility to 
fix the
resulting breakage. That's part of your responsibiliity to the rest 
of the
community (i.e. the [mostly non-paying] customers). If you don't 
think you
have this responsibility to us, then you should work on your own 
version of
Zope, where you're not impacting anyone else.

For the record, I hate ZClasses... d8)
 

I wish Terri Shiavo had as much compassion as ZClasses.
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Perhaps a unfortunated comment
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


[Zope] Does anyone care whether we deprecate Your Favourite Part of Zope

2005-04-06 Thread Andrew Milton
I think people on this list need to realize that eventually, the direction of
any significantly large Open Source project is hijacked by the relatively
small number of people actually doing the work.

The reasons for this are many-fold, but, normally come down to a lack of
communication between the developers and the users, which is realized in a
lack of understanding by the developers of what the users want.

This for the most part isn't generally a problem, until, the developers start
to do things for the user's own good, like remove features that are
kludgey, or a hack, or insert some other reason, which generally means
either noone wants to work on it, or some other change caused it to break, and
noone wants to fix it.

Now to the credit of the Zope guys, they actually poll the users to find out,
rather than just announce the demise of something. However, in general once 
you add a feature, you can be guaranteed, that somewhere, someone is using 
it, so removing it will always cause a problem. So there will always be an
uproar when you poll.

You're never going to be able to reduce the feature set between point
releases without upsetting some group of people. So why don't we stop all this
nonsense now, and just agree, that you're never going to do that d8) You have
Zope 3 to remove all the stuff you hate d8)

In my opinion if you change something, it's your responsibility to fix the
resulting breakage. That's part of your responsibiliity to the rest of the
community (i.e. the [mostly non-paying] customers). If you don't think you
have this responsibility to us, then you should work on your own version of
Zope, where you're not impacting anyone else.

For the record, I hate ZClasses... d8)

-- 
Andrew Milton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )