Re: [Zope] Re: Zope on Solaris

2005-08-21 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 20. August 2005 16:26:05 -0700 Steve McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, the concerns about Solaris were related to poor performance under Solaris 8 on a multi-Sparc platform. Anybody got any more recent information that might apply to Solaris 10 or to an Opteron platform? To

[Zope] Re: Zope on Solaris

2005-08-20 Thread Steve McMahon
Brian Sullivan wrote: ... Matt Hamilton's report is still probably your best resource if you find yourself with the gun to your head: http://www.zope.org/Members/glpb/solaris OK -- I get the picture I think ;-) I will try to dodge the Solaris bullet if I can. Just for the record, the

[Zope] Re: Zope on Solaris

2005-08-11 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Sullivan wrote: From what I can determine Zope does or should run on Solaris on a Sun server. Is that assumption correct. Can anybody point to any resources or have any comments/opinions-- like what versions of Zope/Solaris seem to be

[Zope] Re: Zope on Solaris

2005-08-11 Thread Brian Sullivan
From what I can determine Zope does or should run on Solaris on a Sun server. Is that assumption correct. Can anybody point to any resources or have any comments/opinions-- like what versions of Zope/Solaris seem to be compatible, any special issues/requirements? Except for the fact

[Zope] Re: Zope on Solaris

2005-08-11 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Sullivan wrote: From what I can determine Zope does or should run on Solaris on a Sun server. Is that assumption correct. Can anybody point to any resources or have any comments/opinions-- like what versions of Zope/Solaris seem to be

[Zope] Re: Zope on Solaris

2005-08-11 Thread Brian Sullivan
Dog slow as compared to what? As compared to commodity server-class Linux/Intel hardware (which will cost you around 1/4 to 1/3 what the equivalent Solaris rig does). I would prefer to do the absolute minimum in terms of tuning. Most of my experience with Zope and otherwise is with