-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garito wrote:
2009/4/27 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com
snip
at least try to don't threaten us with ban us if we
send you private messages by mistake
I don't know what you are talking about here: I didn't threaten to ban
anybody. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garito wrote:
jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
Amazing!
I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field
jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
I said religious because I meant that people have strong opinions
about which style they
2009/4/27 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garito wrote:
jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
Amazing!
I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field
jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
I said religious because I meant that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Gerken wrote:
Argl, why does this mailing list not use the reply-to: field?
That would be a religious question, and one which is not helpful to
debate here.. E.g., see:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
The Zope mailing
jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
Amazing!
I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field
jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
What wonders me more is how belligerent some in this list are with this
question
You cause the problem, at least try to don't threaten us with ban us if we
send
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 19:45, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Gerken wrote:
Argl, why does this mailing list not use the reply-to: field?
That would be a religious question, and one which is not helpful to
debate here..
Argl, why does this mailing list not use the reply-to: field?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.com
Date: Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 15:43
Subject: Re: [Zope] Building a fast, scalable yet small Zope application
To: Morten W. Petersen
