mark hellewell wrote at 2005-5-7 20:22 +0100:
>On 5/7/05, Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Web Folders pass cookies around too, FWIW, so it's probably not strictly
>> necessary to use http basic auth. But without using http basic auth,
>> there is no way to log in unless you have them
On 5/7/05, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, in theory its possible if the client accepts cookie to just
> store the amount of wrong attempts via cookie (or id - which would
> be the same) and deny any password, be it even the correct one
> when it comes via basic auth.
Store the
On 5/7/05, Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Web Folders pass cookies around too, FWIW, so it's probably not strictly
> necessary to use http basic auth. But without using http basic auth,
> there is no way to log in unless you have them go to the web interface
> first, then launch a we
Am Samstag, den 07.05.2005, 12:04 -0400 schrieb Chris McDonough:
> Web Folders pass cookies around too, FWIW, so it's probably not strictly
> necessary to use http basic auth. But without using http basic auth,
> there is no way to log in unless you have them go to the web interface
> first, then
Web Folders pass cookies around too, FWIW, so it's probably not strictly
necessary to use http basic auth. But without using http basic auth,
there is no way to log in unless you have them go to the web interface
first, then launch a web folder, so maybe impractical.
- C
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 0
On May 6, 2005, at 23:52 , mark hellewell wrote:
On 5/6/05, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, it does not. You have no such thing like a session
when all you have is webdav. I dont know if many dav-clients
store cookies too - it may depend on your usecase.
Yes the use-case is Win
On 5/6/05, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, it does not. You have no such thing like a session
> when all you have is webdav. I dont know if many dav-clients
> store cookies too - it may depend on your usecase.
Yes the use-case is Windows Explorer users only.
> Without cooki
Am Freitag, den 06.05.2005, 19:26 +0100 schrieb mark hellewell:
> On 5/6/05, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > WebDAV uses "basic HTTP authentication" which should use whatever
> > UserFolder you have installed.
>
> Thanks.. So, I think I should be able to modify the authentication p
On 5/6/05, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WebDAV uses "basic HTTP authentication" which should use whatever
> UserFolder you have installed.
Thanks.. So, I think I should be able to modify the authentication plugin
of PUF so that each time a user makes a bad login attempt (either via
mark hellewell wrote at 2005-5-6 14:44 +0100:
>I have a site that uses PluggableUserFolders for its acl_users.
>The web-based portion of the login process locks out a user
>after 3 unsuccessfull attempts at the password and i'd like to be
>able to do something similar for users who try to connect
>
Hello!
I'd like a little help, please :)
I have a site that uses PluggableUserFolders for its acl_users.
The web-based portion of the login process locks out a user
after 3 unsuccessfull attempts at the password and i'd like to be
able to do something similar for users who try to connect
via WebD
11 matches
Mail list logo
