On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:31:29PM +0100, Maciej Wisniowski wrote:
> > As for me, I am lazy. ZPT does things in a way that few other frameworks do,
> > although Ruby's Amrita2 sort of resembles ZPT.
Not really. It's more closely related to the Meld family (pymeld,
pymeldlite, meld3), and to XMLC.
> As for me, I am lazy. ZPT does things in a way that few other frameworks do,
> although Ruby's Amrita2 sort of resembles ZPT.
> Displaying phantom text in a static page which will
> not be there dynamically is not superior to DTML.
> It is just more confusing. I have never learned ZPT
> well an
nal Message-
From: Dieter Maurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:01 PM
To: Andreas Jung
Cc: Mark, Jonathan (Integic); zope@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope] Isn't DTML more like what other frameworks do?
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-1-8 19:08 +0100:
> ...
>
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-1-8 19:08 +0100:
> ...
>The question is: what is easier to learn and to understand - DTML or ZPT?
>Can you explain the "nonsense" of the _ namespace in DTML to a newbie?
Sure.
There is only one caveat: that two positional arguments need to
be passed for recursive calls
--On 9. Januar 2007 07:47:28 + Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
The question is: what is easier to learn and to understand - DTML or ZPT?
The correct answer is, of course, Twiddler ;-)
http://www.simplistix.co.uk/software/python/twiddler
Yes, you dese
Andreas Jung wrote:
The question is: what is easier to learn and to understand - DTML or ZPT?
The correct answer is, of course, Twiddler ;-)
http://www.simplistix.co.uk/software/python/twiddler
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simpli
Aloha,
Mark, Jonathan (Integic) wrote:
What does matter is that DTML is very similar to RHTML (as in Ruby On
Rails), ASP, etc. ZPT requires a new way of thinking. I would much
rather convert RHTML to or from DTML than to or from ZPT.
So I don't really get the benefit of using ZPT. The fact that
--On 8. Januar 2007 13:01:26 -0500 "Mark, Jonathan (Integic)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"""Why (the hell) are you (still) using DTML (as newbie). You are strongly
encouraged to use ZPT."""
My sense is that ZPT solves a problem which for most of us does not
exist. If you wish to have design
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/08/2007 01:01:26 PM:
> """Why (the hell) are you (still) using DTML (as newbie). You are
strongly
> encouraged to use ZPT."""
>
> My sense is that ZPT solves a problem which for most of us does not
> exist. If you wish to have designers work directly on markup in a
"""Why (the hell) are you (still) using DTML (as newbie). You are strongly
encouraged to use ZPT."""
My sense is that ZPT solves a problem which for most of us does not exist. If
you wish to have designers work directly on markup in an HTML WYSIWYG editor
then yes, ZPT is great.
But most of us
10 matches
Mail list logo