Hi Christopher,
Great pointers, thank you very much for your response!
I use pound for load balancing (from the beginning - nothing changed here).
I will investigate using your indications.
Thanks again,
Dragos
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Christopher Lozinski <
Good morning all,
after further testing we noticed our Zope2 virtualenv setup was done with the
ZMS3 (CMS) install routine using pip install ZMS3 --process-dependency-links.
This installed different package versions.
The original pip Zope2 uses these versions: http://pastebin.com/ZEwhVba0
The
thanks for the „shot“, yet disabling IPv6 locally on the VM does not help, same
error:
(server):
2015-05-06T10:05:51 INFO ZEO.StorageServer (127.0.0.1:44833) disconnected
--
2015-05-06T10:05:51 INFO ZEO.zrpc.Connection('S') (127.0.0.1:44835) received
handshake 'Z3101'
--
After more „research“ I see that the ZMS3 pip packages uses completely
different versions that don’t seem to be compatible with ZEO (at least Undo is
not working). I’m aware „undo“ is not a really used feature at all as revisions
most of the time are beeing implemented by products. My only fear
After further testing I was able to sort this one out by downgrading ZopeUndo
to 2.12.0 (pip install ZopeUndo==2.12.0 --force —upgrade).
PyPi only said 4.0 brought Py3 compability. Should I expect any problems using
ZopeUndo 2.12 + ZEO/ZODB4/ZODB3 with their latest versions?
Best, Sebastian
Hi Sebastian,
Am 06.05.2015 um 15:26 schrieb Sebastian Tänzer:
After further testing I was able to sort this one out by downgrading
ZopeUndo to 2.12.0 (pip install ZopeUndo==2.12.0 --force —upgrade).
PyPi only said 4.0 brought Py3 compability. Should I expect any
problems using ZopeUndo
Am 6. Mai 2015 01:24:50 MESZ, schrieb Sebastian Tänzer s...@taenzer.me:
2015-05-06 01:16:46 WARNING ZEO.zrpc (19205) CW: error connecting to
('::1', ): ECONNREFUSED
2015-05-06 01:16:46 INFO ZEO.ClientStorage zeostorage Testing
connection ManagedClientConnection ('127.0.0.1', )
2015-05-06
Hello,
I am working on a solution that has a very high number of users and a
significant amount of traffic. Using a zeo configuration we have been running
into a few bottle necks while trying to improve our load testing results. The
problem we see is if that put our Zeo Configuration under
Hi
What's the difference between the to cache-size settings here?
I've not been able to find a good description to guide me in finding the
right values.
zodb_db main
mount-point /
cache-size 1 1.
zeoclient
server foo:9080
storage main
name zeostorage
var
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaute Amundsen wrote:
Hi
What's the difference between the to cache-size settings here?
I've not been able to find a good description to guide me in finding the
right values.
zodb_db main
mount-point /
cache-size 1 1.
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 03:57 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaute Amundsen wrote:
Hi
What's the difference between the to cache-size settings here?
I've not been able to find a good description to guide me in finding the
right values.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaute Amundsen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 03:57 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
The ZEO client cache is a disk-based cache, separate from the RAM-based
cache used by any ZODB connection. It doesn't use RAM, per se, except
for an in-memory index of
+---[ Mikael Kermorgant ]--
| Hello,
|
| We're using a zope 2.10 setup with a zeo server and several zeo clients behind
| lvs.
|
| Sometimes, we'd like to track which zeo client handled teh request, and we're
| going to need it as we'd like to proove that ha-proxy handles
Hi All:
I have a zeo setup which has one zeo server (say s1) and 5 zeo clients (say
c1 through c5). All of these clients share a single Data.fs. Now, I need a
zeo server (say s2) between just some of the zeo clients (say c1 and c2).
all of these instances should share just one Dafa.fs file. Is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Analog Kid wrote:
I have a zeo setup which has one zeo server (say s1) and 5 zeo clients (say
c1 through c5). All of these clients share a single Data.fs. Now, I need a
zeo server (say s2) between just some of the zeo clients (say c1 and c2).
all
Jean Jordaan wrote at 2008-8-13 12:26 +0700:
We have a server running many ZEO clusters (many more than the number of
CPUs, of course). Each cluster consists of a master and two clients.
Would it make sense to run both clients and spread requests across them?
Usually, this would make sense when
--On 13. August 2008 12:26:28 +0700 Jean Jordaan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there
We have a server running many ZEO clusters (many more than the number of
CPUs, of course). Each cluster consists of a master and two clients.
Would it make sense to run both clients and spread requests
Hi there
We have a server running many ZEO clusters (many more than the number of
CPUs, of course). Each cluster consists of a master and two clients.
Would it make sense to run both clients and spread requests across them?
Or would it be better to just increase the number of threads of a
I'm trying to find more documentation about all the configuration parameters
for a zeo.conf
Namely, I have a zope with multiple zodb's and mount points. I am trying to
learn how to migration a single zope instance with multiple mounts into zeo.
One thing I don't understand is temporary storage.
David Bear schrieb:
I'm trying to find more documentation about all the configuration
parameters for a zeo.conf
I *believe* on plope.org there was an introduction to it with some more
parameters explained.
Namely, I have a zope with multiple zodb's and mount points. I am trying
to learn
--On 22. April 2008 15:16:55 -0700 David Bear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to find more documentation about all the configuration
parameters for a zeo.conf
Namely, I have a zope with multiple zodb's and mount points. I am trying
to learn how to migration a single zope instance with
FuBuJo wrote at 2008-3-14 22:06 +:
...
I thought putting Apache in front of Zope was very common (using VirtualHost
Monster) - guess not.
This is common. But, usually, a ZEO client is not abbreviated as ZEO.
ZEO usually means the ZEO server.
...
It's the python process on the Zeo Client
FuBuJo schrieb:
I apologize that my description was so confusing.
I appreciate the feedback and so would like to clarify.
The diagram is how the traffic flows. So we have:
Step 1 - a Load Balancer that passes traffic to Apache
Step 2 - Apache which uses mod_proxy to obfuscate the URL and
Hello. I've thumbed through the list for Zope Zeo performance issues similar to
mine - but have found a lot of conflicting information - so I thought I'd ask
(and keep reading and experimenting).
Zope - 2.7.x (Zeo) Apache 2.x Zope is using Plone (2.0.x)
Basically I have a high traffic (high
remains CPU bound by
the
python process ... and you have to bounce Zope(Zeo instance) and Apache to free
it.
Which system? The one running ZEO (the ZEO server) or the one running
Zope?
The ZODB reports heavy Clients waiting ... but doesn't budge on load.
You see this in the ZEO logfile
I apologize that my description was so confusing.
I appreciate the feedback and so would like to clarify.
The diagram is how the traffic flows. So we have:
Step 1 - a Load Balancer that passes traffic to Apache
Step 2 - Apache which uses mod_proxy to obfuscate the URL and proxies traffic to
the
Ricardo Newbery wrote at 2008-1-29 22:56 -0800:
...
Another related question. With respect to conflict resolution, is is
safe to assume that products (with _p_resolveConflict methods) in the
main Zope products directory are already available to the ZEO server
without any special
On Jan 29, 2008, at 1:19 AM, Ricardo Newbery wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Zope uses Python import magic to make packages available
in INSTANCE_HOME/Products as additional products in
the Products package.
If some of these products need application
Occasionally, someone asks whether Solaris is an adequate platform
for Zope/ZEO deployment.
Up to now, I answered to those questions -- we are using Solaris
in our backend and up to now we did not see problems.
This changed a few days ago -- we met an incredible limitation
in Solaris: the number
Bengt Giger wrote at 2007-4-10 15:36 +0200:
with our new ZEO client systems, we frequently observe this problem:
a ZEO process starts to use 100% CPU time (user) without a significant
increase of requests. Sometimes (but not always) the process stops answering
requests, still using 100% CPU.
I have posted this several times, but have not until now been able to
get DeadlockDebugger installed.
zope 2.9.5 + zeo
pythonm2.4.3
Red Hat RHEL 4
Plone 2.5.1
Our zeo clients hang intermittently. We have no way of reproducing the
problem, but it occurs daily. The client hangs and a
cristopher pierson ewing, on 2007-01-23:
I've been told that zope is not set up to utilize the extra processing
power of multiproc machines. I have a new intel x-serve with the
dual-core dual-proc setup, and want to get the most I can out of zope.
I've read a few articles that mention
I've been told that zope is not set up to utilize the extra processing
power of multiproc machines. I have a new intel x-serve with the
dual-core dual-proc setup, and want to get the most I can out of zope.
I've read a few articles that mention running more than one zope process
as zeo
--On 23. Januar 2007 09:24:56 -0800 cristopher pierson ewing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been told that zope is not set up to utilize the extra processing
power of multiproc machines. I have a new intel x-serve with the
dual-core dual-proc setup, and want to get the most I can out of
Ola,
thx maciej and Jonathan...your answers have helped a lot
Each zope instance can access multiple ZODB's (as Maciej mentions
later), which means that the zope instance can access both a shared zodb
and a local zodb which is specific to the zope instance.
auaua...i didn't know that
- Original Message -
From: ian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Maciej Wisniowski [EMAIL PROTECTED];
zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zeo question
Ola,
thx maciej and Jonathan...your answers have helped a lot
Each
auaua...i didn't know that ;)...this is really cool. Now the
inevitable question - 'Is there any documentation about how to set
this up ?'
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/HowtoRunAZEOServer/howto.html
http://plope.com/Books/2_7Edition/ZEO.stx
and one more interesting thing:
Ola,
You can easily do this by changing the 'display' routines on each zope
instance
I feel so stupid asking but what do you mean by this...i have googled
but cannot find anything about 'zope display routines' ...
Do you mean this:
In the zope instances I can create a folder custom and
- Original Message -
From: ian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zeo question
Ola,
You can easily do this by changing the 'display' routines on each zope
instance
I feel so stupid
Hi,
Hope you can help
1. I am having trouble connecting a zope client to a zeo database.The
server and client are in different goegraphical locations and behind
different proxies and firewalls. I read that they communicate using a
'custom RPC protocol'...what does this mean and does it have
2. I can create a custom skin on each zope (in reality plone) instance
right or is each zope instance is just a mirror of the other?
Nope. It is something different. In general ZEO is about sharing ZODB
(Zope Object Database) between few Zope instances. There is no mirroring
but just one ZODB.
- Original Message -
From: Maciej Wisniowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zope@zope.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zeo question
2. I can create a custom skin on each zope (in reality plone) instance
right or is each zope instance
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:32:38AM +0200, Maciej Wisniowski wrote:
zope 2.8.5 + zeo
python 2.3.4 (red hat distribution)
Red Hat RHEL 4
Plone 2.1.2
Our zeo clients hang intermittently. We have no way of reproducing the
problem, but it occurs daily. The client hangs and a restart seems
the same URL jump to the other Zope/ZEO client and same thing
happens there. Another few reloads and one user has effectively crashed
the siteuntil the threads clear themselves out. Usually is a catalog
search for a news article or something spanning our 6 years of online
news articles
Hello,
We have been having problem with our production servers. We currently have:
zope 2.8.5 + zeo
pythonm2.3.4
Red Hat RHEL 4
Plone 2.1.2
Our zeo clients hang intermittently. We have no way of reproducing the
problem, but it occurs daily. The client hangs and a restart seems to fix the
Hello,We have been having problem with our production servers. We currently have:zope 2.8.5 + zeopython 2.3.4 (red hat distribution)Red Hat RHEL 4Plone 2.1.2Our zeo clients hang intermittently. We have no way of reproducing the problem, but it occurs daily. The client hangs and a restart seems
zope 2.8.5 + zeo
python 2.3.4 (red hat distribution)
Red Hat RHEL 4
Plone 2.1.2
Our zeo clients hang intermittently. We have no way of reproducing the
problem, but it occurs daily. The client hangs and a restart seems to
fix the
problem.
Install DeadlockDebugger and you'll be able to see
Title: Re: [Zope] ZEO and Data.fs
No, you just need to change zope.conf to move from FileStorage to ClientStorage, and then you can move your Data.fs file to ZEO var directory and start zeo.
Pascal
De : Sinang, Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:38:48 +0800
: zope@zope.org
Hello,
We're currently not
using ZEO, but may do so in the future.
Question is, do we
need to export or convertour Data.fs toa ZEO-capableformat
?
Regards,
Danny
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**
--On 18. September 2006 21:38:48 +0800 Sinang, Danny
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We're currently not using ZEO, but may do so in the future.
Question is, do we need to export or convert our Data.fs to a
ZEO-capable format ?
No, just create a new ZEO instance and copy over the
On 9/14/06, Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you mean having zope commit a single transaction to multiple storages,
then 'vanilla' zope won't do it (Zope Corp has a commercial product called
ZRS which does this type of thing).
No, that's not true. ZRS is used to create hot read-only or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 08:54, Martijn Pieters wrote:
One ZEO server can deal with multiple storages just fine. Transactions
involving multiple storages commit just fine.
Caveat: You buy nothing by having a single ZEO process serve several
ZODBs
- Original Message -
From: Martijn Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Brian Brinegar [EMAIL PROTECTED]; zope@zope.org
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
On 9/14/06, Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 13:56, Jonathan wrote:
Yes: a single zeo server can deal with multiple storages (ie. a
storage can contain mount points to other storages)
That's misleading wording, a storage knows nothing at all about
mounts. The storage
- Original Message -
From: Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [Zope] List Mailing zope@zope.org
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 13:56, Jonathan wrote:
Yes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 15:34, Jonathan wrote:
Yes: a single zeo server can deal with multiple storages (ie. a
storage can contain mount points to other storages)
That's misleading wording, a storage knows nothing at all about
mounts. The storage
- Original Message -
From: Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [Zope] List Mailing zope@zope.org
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 13:56, Jonathan wrote:
Yes
Brian Brinegar wrote at 2006-9-13 21:22 -0400:
... partioning large data sets onto different storages ...
First off, does this make any sense?
I makes sense and we do it successfully with our large editorial
system.
However, ensure that each storage is self contained data wise:
e.g. do not
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2006-9-14 15:50 +0200:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 15:34, Jonathan wrote:
Yes: a single zeo server can deal with multiple storages (ie. a
storage can contain mount points to other storages)
That's misleading wording, a storage
We currently have a ZEO environment with FileStorage (data.fs) over 100
gigs, which continues to grow. Currently we are approaching a major
hardware and software upgrade. All new hardware and moving from Zope 2.6
to Zope 2.9.
Our server hosts sites for several different schools and
- Original Message -
From: Brian Brinegar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 9:22 PM
Subject: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
We currently have a ZEO environment with FileStorage (data.fs) over 100
gigs, which continues to grow. Currently we
Hi;
I'm reading the Plone book. It states that for Zope 2.7 (I have 2.78)
ZEO is built in by default but must be instantiated thus:
cd /opt/Zope-2/7/bin
./mkzeoinstance /var/zeo
or some such code. So I tried this:
cd /usr/local/zope/278/bin
./mkzeoinstance.py ../../instance2/var/zeo
where
- Original Message -
From: beno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 9:24 AM
Subject: [Zope] ZEO Problem
Hi;
I'm reading the Plone book. It states that for Zope 2.7 (I have 2.78) ZEO
is built in by default but must be instantiated thus:
cd /opt
AM
Subject: [Zope] ZEO Problem
Hi;
I'm reading the Plone book. It states that for Zope 2.7 (I have 2.78)
ZEO is built in by default but must be instantiated thus:
cd /opt/Zope-2/7/bin
./mkzeoinstance /var/zeo
or some such code. So I tried this:
cd /usr/local/zope/278/bin
./mkzeoinstance.py
- Original Message -
From: beno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO Problem
I got this working by changing the following in zope.conf:
server localhost:7080
to
server 202.71.106.119:
Apparently, it needs
Jonathan wrote:
I got this working by changing the following in zope.conf:
server localhost:7080
to
server 202.71.106.119:
Apparently, it needs its own port?
TIA,
beno
You need to make sure that the entry in your zeo client config file
(zope.conf)
eg
zeoclient
server
--On 2. September 2006 12:15:47 -0400 beno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zeo
address 8100
and that your zeo server is running on the ip address specified in the
zeoclient entry in zope.conf
That's logical. Why does zeo need its own port?
Because every kind of network service needs its own
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:09:56PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-8-7 15:54 +0200:
...
2006-08-07T14:29:19 INFO ZEO.StorageServer (97002/10.152.64.23:52518)
Transaction
+blocked waiting for storage. Clients waiting: 1.
...
2006-08-07T14:29:50 INFO
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-8-8 08:06 +0200:
... long time commit locks ...
To understand this can you tell me when a transaction is started and when
its closed. Does the Zeo server wait until all data is recieved bevor the
transaction is started or does the transaktion start when the
HI,
we have quite a Problem with out Zope/Zeo system. We run at the moment
Zope cluster with 10 application servers and a zeo server with
Filestorage. Our Data.fs is 3.5 Gig at the moment (after Pack).
I runs most of the time without problem. But sometimes things screw up
2006-08-07T14:29:19
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-8-7 15:54 +0200:
...
2006-08-07T14:29:19 INFO ZEO.StorageServer (97002/10.152.64.23:52518)
Transaction
+blocked waiting for storage. Clients waiting: 1.
...
2006-08-07T14:29:50 INFO ZEO.StorageServer (97002/10.152.64.17:54463) Blocked
transaction restarted.
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:24:29PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-2 09:52 +0200:
...
I try to reduce the load of the line between the backup Computing Center
and the Mainsite by having a zeo server as Proxy between the zope server
at the backup site an the ZEO
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 2 May 2006, at 08:52, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
A configuration like that is described in the Zope Book on page 230.
I'd like to see that. The proxying you describe is simply not possible,
period.
He's decribing the dead tree version of the Zope Book. Either Amos or
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-3 08:20 +0200:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:24:29PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-2 09:52 +0200:
...
I try to reduce the load of the line between the backup Computing Center
and the Mainsite by having a zeo server as Proxy between
Hallo,
I am trying to install a setup like shown below
ZEO_M
| -- ZEO_B
| | -- ZOPE
| | -- ZOPE
| | -- ZOPE
| ...
| -- ZOPE
| -- ZOPE
...
The ZEO_B should be a zeoclient of the ZEO_M (MainZEO). The reason for
this setup ist that the ZEO_B is located in a backup
--On 2. Mai 2006 08:31:17 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
I am trying to install a setup like shown below
ZEO_M
| -- ZEO_B
| | -- ZOPE
| | -- ZOPE
| | -- ZOPE
| ...
| -- ZOPE
| -- ZOPE
...
You are trying to create a cascade of multiple ZEO
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:51:12AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 2. Mai 2006 08:31:17 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
I am trying to install a setup like shown below
ZEO_M
| -- ZEO_B
| | -- ZOPE
| | -- ZOPE
| | -- ZOPE
| ...
| --
--On 2. Mai 2006 09:52:57 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A configuration like that is described in the Zope Book on page 230.
I can not see anything like that in the Zope Book 2.7 edition. As said
a ZEO client talks to a *ZEO server* and *not* to another *ZEO client*.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2 May 2006, at 08:52, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
A configuration like that is described in the Zope Book on page 230.
I'd like to see that. The proxying you describe is simply not
possible, period.
As Andreas mentioned, the (commercial) ZRS
Hi there,
One of my clients is using Plone on Solaris 9. We have set up one ZEO
client on a Solaris machine and a ZEO server on another Solaris machine
(for testing purposes only at this stage).
Performance is great but every morning, the first hit to the Plone site
returns a
Dennis Allison wrote at 2006-2-7 18:18 -0800:
...
What sort of Zope failure can cause this sort of behavior? What's the
best approach to get more information to localize the failure.
A crash presented to Zope as a fatal signal (usually SIGSEGV
or SIGBUS).
Reconfigure your Linux account
Dennis Allison wrote:
2006-02-06T14:07:20 INFO ZPublisher.Conflict ConflictError at
some path:
database conflict error (oid 0x086e, class BTrees._OOBTree.OOBTree, serial
this txn started with 0x03633ca95f75e900 2006-02-06 22:01:22.373575,
serial currently committed 0x03633caf59114244
Zope 2.9.0
Python 2.4.2
Amd dual Opteron
Linux
I am seeing occasional (several per day) Zope crashes under load. The
event.log immediately before and after the crash looks like:
2006-02-06T14:07:20 INFO ZPublisher.Conflict ConflictError at
some path:
database conflict error (oid 0x086e,
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 06:18:49PM -0800, Dennis Allison wrote:
Zope 2.9.0
Python 2.4.2
Amd dual Opteron
Linux
I am seeing occasional (several per day) Zope crashes under load. The
event.log immediately before and after the crash looks like:
2006-02-06T14:07:20 INFO
Arh...
I forgot that internal logging levels override.
Still, you'd think something that triggers a crash would have a level
higher than info. Careful examination of the trace log shows nothing.
I'll fix the log level see if that turns anything up.
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Paul Winkler
Zope 2.9.0
We are seeing spontaneous restarts of Zope with no indication in any of
the standard Zope logs. Looking at the ZEO log indicates that the
restarts of Zope are due to a lost connection between Zope ZEO but
with no other information. The logging level is set at the distribution
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:00:45AM -0800, Dennis Allison wrote:
Zope 2.9.0
We are seeing spontaneous restarts of Zope with no indication in any of
the standard Zope logs. Looking at the ZEO log indicates that the
restarts of Zope are due to a lost connection between Zope ZEO
are seeing spontaneous restarts of Zope with no indication in any of
the standard Zope logs. Looking at the ZEO log indicates that the
restarts of Zope are due to a lost connection between Zope ZEO but
with no other information. The logging level is set at the distribution
default (INFO
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:35:11AM -0800, Dennis Allison wrote:
Timing correlates to the second. Zope and ZEO live on the
same physical box.
OK. Do you have more than one ZEO client? If not,
I'd reevaluate whether you need ZEO at all.
(It's great for zopectl debug on a live
On Feb 3, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
If I were in your shoes the first thing I'd do is bump up the log
levels
on both zope and zeo to BLATHER. Adds overhead I know, but you
need to find
the problem somehow... it's a weird one, I've never seen zope
restart for no reason.
This
Mika, David P (Research) wrote:
I see that ZEO supports a simple digest authenitcation of clients and that this
is set in the zeo's config file with the keys: authentication-protocol,
authentication-database and authentication-realm.
Further, I can see that a client can connect using e.g.
Of Sascha
Ottolski
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 11:40 AM
To: zope@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO client authentication
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2005 14:44 schrieb Mika, David P (Research):
I see that ZEO supports a simple digest authenitcation of clients and that
this is set in the zeo's config
I see that ZEO supports a simple digest authenitcation of clients and that this
is set in the zeo's config file with the keys: authentication-protocol,
authentication-database and authentication-realm.
Further, I can see that a client can connect using e.g. ZEO.ClientStorage with
arguments for
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2005 14:44 schrieb Mika, David P (Research):
I see that ZEO supports a simple digest authenitcation of clients and that
this is set in the zeo's config file with the keys:
authentication-protocol, authentication-database and authentication-realm.
Further, I can see that
Perhaps your FS grows because ZEO write the cache files to /tmp (which is
on your root filesystem)?
-aj
--On 30. September 2005 14:06:16 +0200 Reinoud van Leeuwen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We have a ZEO setup with a Plone based intranet, and for some reason it
seems that Zope is
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 02:13:34PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Perhaps your FS grows because ZEO write the cache files to /tmp (which is
on your root filesystem)?
No I checked that. Nothing in /tmp (and that would have been listed by
lsof)
--
Hi
Does anyone know if the 2.0.5 windows release of Plone includes ZEO? Is there any configuration information on this? Also does Zope 2.8 for linux have ZEO as standard.
Finally, if you don't run ZEO does this mean that Zope can only handle one request at a time?
Thanks
michael nt milne wrote at 2005-8-24 11:52 +0100:
Does anyone know if the 2.0.5 windows release of Plone includes ZEO?
Do you have installed it?
Then see whether the Zope part contains the folder ZEO
(usually in lib/python). If it does, then it contains ZEO.
Also does Zope 2.8 for linux
have
[michael nt milne]
...
Also does Zope 2.8 for linux have ZEO as standard.
All versions of Zope at and after 2.7 include ZEO, and regardless of
platform (Linux, Windows, Solaris, ..., doesn't matter).
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
michael nt milne wrote:
Hi
Does anyone know if the 2.0.5 windows release of Plone includes ZEO?
Ask on a Plone list.
Is
there any configuration information on this?
Dunno what you mean.
Also does Zope 2.8 for linux
have ZEO as standard.
Yes.
Finally, if you don't run ZEO does
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
