rking back, but after having looked at it closer, the
HTML is not bad at all.
Cheers, Peter
- Original Message -
From: Svante Kleist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 5:35 PM
Subject: [Zope] "http://www.zope.org": HORRIBLE HTML
Has anybody tried
Has anybody tried to validate the Zope homepage? Like so:
URL: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zope.org%2F
My attention was drawn to this sad fact when I reported
(was I thought was) a bug in Mozilla:
URL: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44757
Is Zope
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Svante Kleist wrote:
Has anybody tried to validate the Zope homepage? Like so:
URL: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zope.org%2F
I think this can be mostly attributed to the people who built zope.org. If
I validate some pretty plain standard page, I get
On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 06:35:36PM +0200, Svante Kleist wrote:
Has anybody tried to validate the Zope homepage? Like so:
URL: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zope.org%2F
My attention was drawn to this sad fact when I reported
(was I thought was) a bug in Mozilla: