On 1/13/06, yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- CMF 1.6 is not yet released so it might be possible to change it directly.
I think we should, but this met some resistance. I want to get rid of
CMFonFive completely. Since CMF with version 1.5.2 became Five-aware,
CMFonFive has lost it's raison
On 1/13/06, Rocky Burt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just going to add my 2 cents regarding non-specific-plone_schemas zope 3
functionality.
- Ability to make custom views easily
Customizing views happens with overrides.zcml today. No plone_schemas
required. This should work for widget
On 1/13/06, David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lennart. Isn't CPSSkins GPL?
Probably.
I would prefer a generic approach that
compatible with the ZPL.
Why?
Would CPSSkins license be changed under this
scenario? I am sure there are others like me that do not develop under
GPL
Yeah, I
Since this got sent over to the CMF mailing list I'll ask here.
Dear CMF mailing list... :)
I've implemented some functionality on the Five branch which enables
regular zope 2 products to be used from the PYTHONPATH and without
requiring the Products toplevel package. But I've identified some
Hi Alec,
I see that plone_schemas covers most of what I was asking about, which is
great :)
I took a look at plone_schemas' example type. I can't get it to install
(Zope won't start, some conflict of versions, I'm sure), but looking at
the code, I notice that you
- Derive from
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:06:43AM -, Martin Aspeli wrote:
| So - one problem is that there is a lot of Plone software out there that
| just assumes all content types are Archetypes.
If you know about software that does this, please speak up. Best I can
tell there's no software that depends
