On Friday 15 September 2006 11:27, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> >Dieter, are you saying that it's fixed somwhere in SVN or is it in
> >your "private" repository?
>
> In our private repository.
would you care to attach your "patch" to
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/454
?
I believe it will be enor
Dmitry S. Makovey wrote at 2006-9-15 09:04 -0600:
> ...
>> I have defined CMF-aware ZODB object types. The one for "File"
>> looks like this:
>>
>> # DM 2005-11-02: added
>> """ CMF 'File' variant (CMF Cache Policy Manager aware)"""
>...skip...
>
>Dieter, are you saying that it's fixed somwhere in
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 11:32, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2006-9-13 09:15 +0200:
> > ...
> >It is a long-standing bug that the CMFDefault File index_html (and
> >download, which is obsolete in newer CMF versions) simply defers
> > to index_html from OFS.File. That one doe
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 01:15, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> If you could, please file a bug report at http://www.zope.org/
> Collectors/CMF/. All that needs to be done is to override
> index_html (which I believe was never done because the
> implementation in OFS.File is quite a beast - it was mu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15 Sep 2006, at 10:16, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I think the remaining question to all other stockholders (CMF
developers, CPS developers) is whether it's OK to push some of the
roadmap items out to 2.2. If that's
Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> I think the remaining question to all other stockholders (CMF
> developers, CPS developers) is whether it's OK to push some of the
> roadmap items out to 2.2. If that's OK then 2.1 doesn't have much
> left to do for it.
Depending on your release process you
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
jens
- "CachingPolicyManager: Support OFS.Cache.CacheManager",
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/408
mhammond
- "Windows Developm
