Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] removing Zope2 interfaces

2007-03-09 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On 3/9/07, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not following, are you saying PAS referred to old-style interfaces defined in the CMF? I wasn't aware of any dependencies there. Not in CMF sorry, just pointing out a general issue. If people have any persistent references to interfaces a

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] removing Zope2 interfaces

2007-03-09 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9 Mar 2007, at 16:17, Sidnei da Silva wrote: PAS used old-style interfaces at one point, and stored references to them in __implements__ attributes on persistent objects. I know because I had to write migration code for an app of mine. I'm not

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] removing Zope2 interfaces

2007-03-09 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On 3/9/07, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sidnei da Silva wrote: > One possible ill effect is persistent references to interfaces due to > PAS. I've reported that a few days ago, but nobody seems to have > noticed. Maybe I wasn't clear: I was talking about oldstyle interfaces using Zope2's I

[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] removing Zope2 interfaces

2007-03-09 Thread yuppie
Sidnei da Silva wrote: One possible ill effect is persistent references to interfaces due to PAS. I've reported that a few days ago, but nobody seems to have noticed. Maybe I wasn't clear: I was talking about oldstyle interfaces using Zope2's Interface package instead of zope.interface. I did

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] removing Zope2 interfaces

2007-03-09 Thread Sidnei da Silva
One possible ill effect is persistent references to interfaces due to PAS. I've reported that a few days ago, but nobody seems to have noticed. -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systemshttp://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 _

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] removing Zope2 interfaces

2007-03-09 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9 Mar 2007, at 12:40, yuppie wrote: Hi! There are no deprecation warnings, but Zope2 interfaces are deprecated for quite a while now. CMF 2.0 and 2.1 should work without using any Zope2 interfaces in your own code or third party products

[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 8 OK, 1 Unknown

2007-03-09 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Thu Mar 8 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Fri Mar 9 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Unit Tests. Unknown --- Subject: UNKNOWN : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Thu Mar 8 21:48:57 EST 2007 URL:

[Zope-CMF] [dev] removing Zope2 interfaces

2007-03-09 Thread yuppie
Hi! There are no deprecation warnings, but Zope2 interfaces are deprecated for quite a while now. CMF 2.0 and 2.1 should work without using any Zope2 interfaces in your own code or third party products. The BBB comments say they will be removed after CMF 2.1. CMF 2.1 has a branch now, so if

[Zope-CMF] CMF 2.1.0-beta released

2007-03-09 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The CMF developer community is hereby announcing the release of CMF version 2.1.0-beta. The CMF 2.1 series will be used as the foundation for the Plone 3.0 release, which will see its first beta over the next few days as well. What is the CMF? The

[Zope-CMF] CMF Collector: Open Issues

2007-03-09 Thread tseaver
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector (http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF). Assigned and Open mhammond - "Windows DevelopmentMode penalty in CMFCore.DirectoryView", [Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/366 Pending / Deferred Issues