-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 14, 2008, at 06:35 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Question: Wouldn't it make sense to enable the new action icons
functionality in the various templates to show icons if an
expression
Hi!
This mail has been lying around for a while because I'm not sure it's
the right way to start the discussion. But now I'll give it a try. Maybe
the sprinters find some time to discuss this:
One result of the Add forms and menus[1] thread was that we'd like to
get add views by portal type
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 14, 2008, at 12:26 , yuppie wrote:
This mail has been lying around for a while because I'm not sure it's
the right way to start the discussion. But now I'll give it a try.
Maybe
the sprinters find some time to discuss this:
We're down
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
b) for URLs like http://www.example.org/guestbook/+/Message
The '+' view already implements IPublishTraverse, so we can't change
traversal using an adapter. The only solution I can see is to replace
the '+' view by a customized version.
This looks like a good
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Easier customization - no need to let people touch the action itself?
You can change a property of an action easily enough with GS or in the
ZMI. So, a separate registry is more isolated, but it's also harder to
guess which portal_actionicons thing you need to
Am 14.09.2008 um 12:26 schrieb yuppie:
This mail has been lying around for a while because I'm not sure it's
the right way to start the discussion. But now I'll give it a try.
Maybe
the sprinters find some time to discuss this:
I had to leave yesterday evening... it would have been great
Am 13.09.2008 um 16:49 schrieb yuppie:
I never used it. But one major function of CMFDefault is to showcase
CMF
features. And I'm not aware of any other code that demonstrates how to
use filtering.
Good point.
If so is it okay to drop the use of the cookie and either
use hidden
Am 14.09.2008 um 13:30 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
Zope 3 does use IAdding for zope.app.form/zope.formlib based add
views;
With z3c.form, IAdding support is optional, but the preference is to
just use views like @@add-foo.html (note: I hate the .html convention;
it is superfluous and looks
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 14.09.2008 um 13:30 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
Zope 3 does use IAdding for zope.app.form/zope.formlib based add
views;
With z3c.form, IAdding support is optional, but the preference is to
just use views like @@add-foo.html (note: I hate the .html convention;
it is
Charlie Clark wrote:
b) for URLs like http://www.example.org/guestbook/+/Message
The '+' view already implements IPublishTraverse, so we can't change
traversal using an adapter. The only solution I can see is to replace
the '+' view by a customized version.
c) for URLs like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
Hi!
This mail has been lying around for a while because I'm not sure it's
the right way to start the discussion. But now I'll give it a try. Maybe
the sprinters find some time to discuss this:
One result of the Add forms and
Hi,
o +1 on 'container/@@add/typename'
this is my suggestion as well
regards, robert
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and
12 matches
Mail list logo