Christian Heimes wrote:
yuppie wrote:
But AFAICS it doesn't make much sense for the CMF to duplicate a
feature that Zope 2.8/Five provides already.
You are right but we can't use new Zope 2.8 features at the moment. It
would delay Plone 2.1 and introduce new dependencies.
I was just
yuppie wrote:
But AFAICS it doesn't make much sense for the CMF to duplicate a feature
that Zope 2.8/Five provides already.
You are right but we can't use new Zope 2.8 features at the moment. It
would delay Plone 2.1 and introduce new dependencies.
Christian
On 17 Jun 2005, at 20:46, Christian Heimes wrote:
yuppie wrote:
But AFAICS it doesn't make much sense for the CMF to duplicate a
feature that Zope 2.8/Five provides already.
You are right but we can't use new Zope 2.8 features at the moment.
It would delay Plone 2.1 and introduce new
Hi Christian!
Christian Heimes wrote:
I'd like to change the queryMethodID method of FactoryTypeInformation in
CMF 1.5 and HEAD. I want to reimplement Archetype's template mixin
feature for CMF. (*)
For the new feature I need the caller context in queryMethodID for a
dynamic view template.
yuppie wrote:
Hi Christian!
Christian Heimes wrote:
I'd like to change the queryMethodID method of FactoryTypeInformation
in CMF 1.5 and HEAD. I want to reimplement Archetype's template mixin
feature for CMF. (*)
For the new feature I need the caller context in queryMethodID for a
Christian Heimes wrote:
yuppie wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you propose:
- Just changing queryMethodID signature and calls?
- Or also adding the TemplateMixin stuff to CMFCore?
- Or also adding an UI for that to CMFDefault?
I'm proposing at least the first point in your list,
