On 6/22/07, Rob Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well. I'd prefer to have *one* obvious and explicit solution. The
failover adds extra code that needs to be maintained and makes it less
obvious where the version number comes from.
i agree. i was thinking since my last reply that, since the
The new GS looks very nice, but from the ZMI UI I can no longer see how
I can import only selected steps of an extension profile. I hope that is
still possible; it can be extremely useful. It looks like the import and
export tab only act on the base profiels now.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman
Previously yuppie wrote:
- How are profile dependencies specified, where are they used?
http://theploneblog.org/blog/archive/2007/06/21/genericsetup-improvements
suggests they are not implemented.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20 Jun 2007, at 06:59, Rob Miller wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Tres reminded me that we should have a real branch and release
tags for GenericSetup to match up with the CMF 2.1-branch and the
releases. I need to determine the current
