The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
mhammond
- Windows DevelopmentMode penalty in CMFCore.DirectoryView,
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/366
Pending / Deferred Issues
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Sun Feb 25 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Mon Feb 26 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Unit Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : CMF-1.6 Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: CMF Unit Tests
Date: Sun Feb 25
On Feb 23, 3:50 pm, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something. But wasn't a major goal of
five.localsitemanager to return acquisition wrapped tools?
That was my understanding, too. I thought this would just mean
aq_base'ing the utility and aq-wrapping
Rocky wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:50 pm, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something. But wasn't a major goal of
five.localsitemanager to return acquisition wrapped tools?
That was my understanding, too. I thought this would just mean
aq_base'ing the utility and
Rocky wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:50 pm, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something. But wasn't a major goal of
five.localsitemanager to return acquisition wrapped tools?
That was my understanding, too. I thought this would just mean
aq_base'ing the utility and
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Rocky wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:50 pm, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something. But wasn't a major goal of
five.localsitemanager to return acquisition wrapped tools?
That was my understanding, too. I thought this would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Rocky wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:50 pm, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something. But wasn't a major goal of
five.localsitemanager to return acquisition wrapped tools?
That was my
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Rocky wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:50 pm, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something. But wasn't a major goal of
five.localsitemanager to return acquisition wrapped
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Rocky wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:50 pm, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Maybe I'm missing
On 26 Feb 2007, at 23:48 , Tres Seaver wrote:
I nowhere said anything about deprecation. All meant was to
discourage
relying on acquisition when developing new tools. I think that
deserves
a comment (I suggested nothing more). No deprecation warning or
anything
necessary;.
OK. I do
10 matches
Mail list logo
