Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Mon Sep 22 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Tue Sep 23 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : CMF-1.6 Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Mon Sep 22 21:27:27 EDT 2008
URL:
Currently CMFCore and zope.dublincore duplicate some of the DC
interfaces. zope.dublincore even has an ICMFDublinCore interface
explicitly dublicing CMFCore's version.
Are there any objections to making the CMFCore interfaces derived
classes from zope.dublincore, or possibly even using those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 23, 2008, at 17:01 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Currently CMFCore and zope.dublincore duplicate some of the DC
interfaces. zope.dublincore even has an ICMFDublinCore interface
explicitly dublicing CMFCore's version.
Are there any objections
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Currently CMFCore and zope.dublincore duplicate some of the DC
interfaces. zope.dublincore even has an ICMFDublinCore interface
explicitly dublicing CMFCore's version.
Are there any objections to making the CMFCore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 23, 2008, at 18:09 , Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Are there any objections to making the CMFCore interfaces derived
classes from zope.dublincore, or possibly even using those
Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On Sep 23, 2008, at 17:01 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Currently CMFCore and zope.dublincore duplicate some of the DC
interfaces. zope.dublincore even has an ICMFDublinCore interface
explicitly dublicing CMFCore's version.
Are there any objections to
