[Zope-CMF] CMF Collector: Open Issues

2005-08-02 Thread tseaver
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector (http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF). Assigned and Open efge - CMFSetup: provide non-ascii im- and exports, [Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/292 - CMFSetup doesn't correctly detect

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF 1.5.3 beta?

2005-08-02 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
Alright, it's out now. I probably spent 90% of the last two hours fighting zope.org which was near-unresponsive... Anyway, since this is a beta the usual precautions apply: - No non-critical-bugfix checkins on the CMF 1.5 branch until CMF 1.5.3 final is out - Please help test the release,

[Zope-CMF] CMF 1.5.3-beta released

2005-08-02 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
The CMF developer community and Zope Corporation are pleased to announce the release of version 1.5.3-beta of the Zope Content Management Framework (CMF). This release is intended for testing purposes only; we do not recommend deploying it to production servers. The final release of version

[Zope-CMF] Re: xsl/xul and FSPageTemplate

2005-08-02 Thread Duncan Booth
Julien Anguenot wrote: Why don't you create your own FSXSLTemplate object ? It's pretty easy to register this kind of objects within the CMF using the dedicated registry. It might even sub-class FSPageTemplate if it makes sense in your case. I would do it like this myself. We could, but kupu

[Zope-CMF] Re: Plone participation in the CMF list

2005-08-02 Thread yuppie
Hi! Geoff Davis wrote: On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:30:20 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: It would help everyone if the CMF side opened up a little more to ideas coming down from Plone, and if the Plone side stopped reinventing wheels that would be much better off (and benefit everyone) in the

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Plone participation in the CMF list

2005-08-02 Thread Florent Guillaume
Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the discussion around Archetypes, in particular, ended up stalled over the question of whether to code generation design should be preferred over configuration-based design (as found in CPSSchemas, for instance). Also now that Zope 3 is taking

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Plone participation in the CMF list

2005-08-02 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
On 2 Aug 2005, at 13:27, Florent Guillaume wrote: Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the discussion around Archetypes, in particular, ended up stalled over the question of whether to code generation design should be preferred over configuration-based design (as found in

[Zope-CMF] Re: Re: Plone participation in the CMF list

2005-08-02 Thread Martin Aspeli
The general mindset of most Plone developers, as I perceive it from the CMF side, seems to be one of I'm in Plone code, and I know what to do here, and I don't need to look beyond my world. Very few developers have a broader view and even think of pushing generic functionality or even

[Zope-CMF] Re: Plone participation in the CMF list

2005-08-02 Thread Rob Miller
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 2 Aug 2005, at 13:27, Florent Guillaume wrote: Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the discussion around Archetypes, in particular, ended up stalled over the question of whether to code generation design should be preferred over configuration-based design

[Zope-CMF] Re: Plone participation in the CMF list

2005-08-02 Thread Rob Miller
Florent Guillaume wrote: Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the discussion around Archetypes, in particular, ended up stalled over the question of whether to code generation design should be preferred over configuration-based design (as found in CPSSchemas, for instance). Also

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Plone participation in the CMF list

2005-08-02 Thread Dieter Maurer
Geoff Davis wrote at 2005-8-1 12:53 -0400: ... * Are there any particular things in Plone that you think should be pushed down into CMF? PloneBatch seems quite useful. I do not use Plone (due to its GPL) but I found the FactoryTool useful. Because it is GPL, I studied its functionality and then