On 1/15/06, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) work on the latest version of CMFonFive supported on Zope 2.8
(CMFonFive 1.2 svn branch) and provide a monkey patch for CMF 1.5 there.
Why do we need to support CMF 1.5?
We probably don't, but: If we want to make the
On 15 Jan 2006, at 12:04, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
CMFonFive version dance confuses the heck out of me, we should
try to
keep things simple.
Yes, I agree. So I think all of CMFonFive, including these changes,
should be in CMF 1.6. That ends the dance. It
On 1/15/06, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:06:43AM -, Martin Aspeli wrote:
| So - one problem is that there is a lot of Plone software out there that
| just assumes all content types are Archetypes.
If you know
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:42:08 -, Tres Seaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to review the current status of a number of the CMF 2.0 roadmap
items, and ask for feedback from the community on how they fit into a
near-term release of a beta for CMF 2.0. In fact, I would like to
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
What I am reading out of this is that *you* yourself have a burning
desire to continue supporting 1.5. I don't quite get it.
My biggest reason for wanting to support CMF 1.5 is so that Plone
developers don't have to wait *at least* another 4 months before they
can build
On 1/11/06, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/11/06, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, the five_actions tool is still completely borked. CMFonFive 1.3
has the correct one, and today I checked in a fix there, so I think
it's stabilizing now. I'll copy the CMFonFive
Hi Martin!
Martin Aspeli wrote:
I had a browse through the code at
http://svn.zope.org/CMF/trunk/CMFCore/interfaces. This work is
interesting to me not at least because it will enable us to write
against CMF (and hopefully Plone soon) code using Z3 idioms (e.g.
accessing things through
On 15 Jan 2006, at 16:31, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 1/11/06, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/11/06, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, the five_actions tool is still completely borked.
CMFonFive 1.3
has the correct one, and today I checked in a fix there, so I
Hi!
The skin scripts for complex forms in CMF like folder_contents are
currently big monolithic blocks of code. All the values needed in the
template are computed in a predefined order that makes sure expensive
tasks like querying the catalog or listing folder contents are performed
only
Hi!
An other issue with converting skin scripts to browser views:
Scripts are untrusted code, the permissions are checked for all methods
called from scripts. Browser views are trusted code, they are only
protect by one permission for the complete view.
Complex forms like folder contents
I propose to add a new directive registerProfile in GenericSetup so
that profile registration can be done through zcml.
What namespace should I use?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of RD
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yuppie wrote:
Hi!
The skin scripts for complex forms in CMF like folder_contents are
currently big monolithic blocks of code. All the values needed in the
template are computed in a predefined order that makes sure expensive
tasks like querying the catalog or listing folder contents are
12 matches
Mail list logo
