Martin Aspeli wrote:
From what you're saying I deduct that Plone 2.1 favours Zope 2.7 over
2.8. Below you are suggesting that Plone 2.5 should do the same with
Zope 2.8 (favouring it over 2.9). I don't understand why that should be.
If one version has to be favoured at all, it should be
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
jens
- Discussion replies removal,
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/391
- 'CMF Default Workflow [Revision 2]' Extension broken,
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
[..]
except perhaps if he wants to get started right now, with Plone 2.1
(though that might still run under Zope 2.9 and CMF 1.6, I hope).
Well, I was tinkering a little bit with Plone 2.1 on Zope 2.9
(or the Plone-2.1 bundle to be precise) not too long ago and
Raphael Ritz wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
[..]
except perhaps if he wants to get started right now, with Plone 2.1
(though that might still run under Zope 2.9 and CMF 1.6, I hope).
Well, I was tinkering a little bit with Plone 2.1 on Zope 2.9
(or the Plone-2.1 bundle to be
also sprach Raphael Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.01.18.1004 +0100]:
Traditionally I think most people use cron for that (call 'zopectl
run my-update-script' assuming you are using ZEO).
Yeah, I know about that, but it requires filesystem access, which is
not very scalable IME.
Alternatively,
Tres Seaver wrote:
I'd like to get the CMF-trunk clean of Deprecation warnings, at least
when running unit tests or starting up Zope, and those emitted by
OFS.subscribers are the remaining ones I know about.
How do you mean for objects to handle the case where *they* need to
respond to
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:45:14 -0800, Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's put it this way: By the time Plone 2.5 is releases (if according to
roadmap), Zope 2.8 is one month away from being *discontinued*.
Conservative
or not, I wouldn't bet on a release line that won't
--On 18. Januar 2006 09:03:15 -0800 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that I'm not saying it *won't* ship with 2.9, just that we reserve
the right to ship with 2.8, since the 2.9 status is still uncertain,
What is uncertain (except the issues with the Windows release)?
-aj
--On 18. Januar 2006 09:30:37 -0800 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:20:41 -0800, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--On 18. Januar 2006 09:03:15 -0800 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Note that I'm not saying it *won't* ship with 2.9, just that we
Andrew Veitch wrote:
Let's put it this way: By the time Plone 2.5 is releases (if
according to roadmap), Zope 2.8 is one month away from being
*discontinued*. Conservative or not, I wouldn't bet on a release
line that won't receive bugfixes the minute I start using it...
Just so I'm clear,
10 matches
Mail list logo
