Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Sat Sep 20 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sun Sep 21 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : CMF-1.6 Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Sep 20 21:25:28 EDT 2008
URL:
Hi Martin!
Martin Aspeli wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Proposed CMFDefault changes
---
1.) CMF add views adapt not only container and request, but also the
type info object. This way the views can't be accessed directly and have
self.fti available.
This is quite
Hi Yuppie,
1.) CMF add views adapt not only container and request, but also the
type info object. This way the views can't be accessed directly and have
self.fti available.
This is quite interesting, and possibly necessary. However, it means
that CMF add views are not just views and will
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi Yuppie,
1.) CMF add views adapt not only container and request, but also the
type info object. This way the views can't be accessed directly and
have
self.fti available.
This is quite
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi Yuppie,
1.) CMF add views adapt not only container and request, but also the
type info object. This way the views can't be accessed
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
I don't feel particularly strongly either way, so long as there's an
actual namespace rather than a naming convention and we avoid an
IPublishTraverse adapter for all IFolderish.
++add++PortalType is a bit uglier than
