Re: [Zope-CMF] portal_fiveactions
Am 04.10.2008 um 16:34 schrieb Jens Vagelpohl: Is anyone actually using the portal_fiveactions tool and the supposed bridging between Z3 menus and CMF actions it is promising? I'm wondering if it's dead wood we're carrying around since it really has not been touched much after the initial import: Not that I'm aware of. Weird doc string in there. Wouldn't mind being able to use Z3 menus but I don't know whether that won't be possible anyway. Charlie -- Charlie Clark Helmholtzstr. 20 Düsseldorf D- 40215 Tel: +49-211-938-5360 GSM: +49-178-782-6226 ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] portal_fiveactions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Oct 4, 2008, at 17:28 , Hanno Schlichting wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: Is anyone actually using the portal_fiveactions tool and the supposed bridging between Z3 menus and CMF actions it is promising? I'm wondering if it's dead wood we're carrying around since it really has not been touched much after the initial import: I think nobody is using it. I doubt it works with new-style CMF actions anyways. Just for clarification: The Five Actions Tool does not replace the normal actions tool, it's a separate tool that acts as an action provider providing only those bridged menu actions. So it's legitimate if it doesn't care about old- or new-style actions. jens -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkjoc/8ACgkQRAx5nvEhZLJzIACfer/fUdO8crZmWmXoXDEoNGSK 14UAn3D/uHVi3o0JlFnAdXOji7NyWqJF =81R8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] portal_fiveactions
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On Oct 4, 2008, at 17:28 , Hanno Schlichting wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: Is anyone actually using the portal_fiveactions tool and the supposed bridging between Z3 menus and CMF actions it is promising? I'm wondering if it's dead wood we're carrying around since it really has not been touched much after the initial import: I think nobody is using it. I doubt it works with new-style CMF actions anyways. Just for clarification: The Five Actions Tool does not replace the normal actions tool, it's a separate tool that acts as an action provider providing only those bridged menu actions. So it's legitimate if it doesn't care about old- or new-style actions. I thought the actions it emits trough the action providers API are old-style ones and it doesn't register itself in portal_actions as an action provider... But no matter what the code does, nobody is using it. I think it's an artifact from the early Zope 3 everywhere-days. Hanno ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 9 OK
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sat Oct 4 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sun Oct 5 11:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : CMF-1.6 Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Sat Oct 4 21:25:25 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-October/010055.html Subject: OK : CMF-1.6 Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Sat Oct 4 21:26:55 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-October/010056.html Subject: OK : CMF-2.0 Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Sat Oct 4 21:28:26 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-October/010057.html Subject: OK : CMF-2.0 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Sat Oct 4 21:29:56 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-October/010058.html Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Sat Oct 4 21:31:26 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-October/010059.html Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Sat Oct 4 21:32:56 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-October/010060.html Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Sat Oct 4 21:34:26 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-October/010061.html Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Sat Oct 4 21:35:56 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-October/010062.html Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Sat Oct 4 21:37:26 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-October/010063.html ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] Pure CSS for main template
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Oct 5, 2008, at 20:06 , Charlie Clark wrote: now that I've got my own branch I've finally made a start on a pure CSS version of main_template.pr for CMFDefault. Please make sure you stick to one functionality/change per branch to make it easier for others to make a diff and understand all the changes. I thought you wanted to use the branch for the folder_contents work only ;-) The idea is not to do a redesign but to implement the existing one using CSS now that pretty much all of the browsers in use have at least adequate support. Customers will hopefully still want to have a different design but it should be easier to do. CMFDefault represents a simple sample application for the CMF. It doesn't have to be pretty by itself, but any changes should have these goals: - make it easier for people to customize the look-and-feel using CSS only, or... - make it easier to take the current main_template as a guideline for a new main_template by making it as simple and understandable as possible. I'm using an em based elastic approach where the layout will grow with the chosen text size. I know that most browsers have now caught up with Opera and offer proper zooming but there are still lots of IE6 installs out there. I'm working on a baseline of 1024 x 768. Does anyone have objections to this? I'd be opposed to any template that uses fixed widths and which does not degrade gracefully with less or more width. jens -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkjpVRAACgkQRAx5nvEhZLKTNQCgs3pmw9BO48mfjL7mm/Qwr/ut CZMAoLf+cGMThVL78uyftDpAA+QLMCRc =n+t3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
