Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-04 Thread yuppie
Hi!


Hanno Schlichting wrote:
 yuppie wrote:
 That would mean that CMFDefault-the-example-application will depend on 
 z3c.form. If we are going to split off the forms we need to split off 
 all browser views and the profiles that use these views. Something like 
 'cmf.app' that includes all the CMFDefault stuff Plone doesn't depend on.
 
 I'd be generally in favor of making the distinction between the
 CMFDefault-example-application and the reusable parts as used by for
 example Plone clearer.
 
 This can happen in two ways, though. Either move the example-application
 bits into a different package or move the reusable bits into one.

It is much easier to move views, skins and profiles around than moving 
persistent or base classes to a new package.

 If you
 are really interested in doing this work, I'd be happy to figure out
 what parts of CMFDefault Plone is actually using.

Fine. I'll come back to you *if* I'll do this work. But I currently have 
no plans to split off *everything* Plone doesn't use. E.g. moving 
content types to a different package doesn't seem to be worth the trouble.


Cheers,

 Yuppie

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-04 Thread yuppie
Hi!


Charlie Clark wrote:
 Am 02.03.2009 um 19:27 schrieb yuppie:
 
 This is on my todo list, but I still have to write a proposal.
 Hmm, I don't recall the issue here.
 There wasn't much discussion about this.

 Some time ago Dieter asked for grouping support:
 http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2008-September/027776.html
 
 I'm still struggling with the abolition of TypeInfo actions so I'd  
 appreciate more discussion or simply explanation of this.

The actions stored inside TypeInfos are not deprecated. We still have no 
replacement for them.

CMF trunk makes the TypeInfos themselves also actions. I don't plan to 
change that. I just like to change how they are looked up. I'll write a 
proposal for that.


Cheers,

Yuppie

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 6 OK

2009-03-04 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Tue Mar  3 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Mar  4 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Tests.


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Tue Mar  3 20:48:27 EST 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-March/011005.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Tue Mar  3 20:50:32 EST 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-March/011006.html

Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Tue Mar  3 20:52:40 EST 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-March/011007.html

Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Tue Mar  3 20:54:40 EST 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-March/011008.html

Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Tue Mar  3 20:56:40 EST 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-March/011009.html

Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Tue Mar  3 20:58:41 EST 2009
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2009-March/011010.html

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests