Re: [Zope-CMF] IMember: does it exist?

2008-10-08 Thread Paul Winkler
Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Oct 8, 2008, at 01:32 , Paul Winkler wrote: > > > Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> then CMF does it's normal wrapping of these user objects using the > >> standard > >> MemberData implementation. > > > > Hmm, right, so then this

Re: [Zope-CMF] IMember: does it exist?

2008-10-08 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Paul Winkler wrote: > Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> then CMF does it's normal wrapping of these user objects using the >> standard >> MemberData implementation. > > Hmm, right, so then this might still be on-topic here ;-) > Maybe the right thing is for CMF to do a directlyProvide

Re: [Zope-CMF] IMember: does it exist?

2008-10-08 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Oct 8, 2008, at 01:32 , Paul Winkler wrote: > Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> then CMF does it's normal wrapping of these user objects using the >> standard >> MemberData implementation. > > Hmm, right, so then this might still be on-

Re: [Zope-CMF] IMember: does it exist?

2008-10-07 Thread Paul Winkler
Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > then CMF does it's normal wrapping of these user objects using the standard > MemberData implementation. Hmm, right, so then this might still be on-topic here ;-) Maybe the right thing is for CMF to do a directlyProvides() call in wrapUser? - PW __

Re: [Zope-CMF] IMember: does it exist?

2008-10-03 Thread Rob Miller
Paul Winkler wrote: > Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'd say that's a typo. The referenced IMember probably means the >> IMemberData interface, which does exist. > > Sounds good. Existing member implementations might have to be updated to > declare > themselves implementing that

Re: [Zope-CMF] IMember: does it exist?

2008-10-03 Thread Paul Winkler
Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd say that's a typo. The referenced IMember probably means the > IMemberData interface, which does exist. Sounds good. Existing member implementations might have to be updated to declare themselves implementing that interface. For example, remember

Re: [Zope-CMF] IMember: does it exist?

2008-10-02 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Oct 2, 2008, at 20:32 , Paul Winkler wrote: > But there does not seem to be any such interface as IMember. > I've grepped everywhere I can think of. > > There probably should be :) I'd say that's a typo. The referenced IMember probably means the

[Zope-CMF] IMember: does it exist?

2008-10-02 Thread Paul Winkler
In CMFCore/interfaces/_tools.py I found several references to an IMember interface: class IMemberDataTool(Interface): ... def wrapUser(user): """Returns an IMember corresponding to the given user object. ... """ ... class IMembershipTool(Interface): ... de