yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Is it ok if I change CMF 1.6 (currently in beta) to use the logging
module instead of zLOG?
zLOG spouts lots of warnings under Zope 2.10 and this sucks.
+1 if you forward port the fixes ;)
(see http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/439)
Done.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Yves Bastide wrote:
And CPS 3.3 and 3.4 have been using Zope 2.9 since its inception, and
is the only recommended "stable" platform for them.
Though they also flood the console with zLOG deprecation warnings ;-)
(I incrementally patched the worst offenders on my local
Yves Bastide wrote:
And CPS 3.3 and 3.4 have been using Zope 2.9 since its inception, and
is the only recommended "stable" platform for them.
Though they also flood the console with zLOG deprecation warnings ;-)
(I incrementally patched the worst offenders on my local copy, but never
sent the
Florent Guillaume wrote:
And CPS 3.3 and 3.4 have been using Zope 2.9 since its inception, and is
the only recommended "stable" platform for them.
Though they also flood the console with zLOG deprecation warnings ;-)
(I incrementally patched the worst offenders on my local copy, but never
se
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 7 Jun 2006, at 20:24, Andreas Jung wrote:
I have the impression that Zope 2.9 is ignored by most ppl :-)
Absolutely not, I test CMF 2.0 against Zope 2.9 ;)
And CPS 3.3 and 3.4 have been using Zope 2.9 since its inception, and is
the only recommended "stable" platfo
On Wed, 2006-07-06 at 18:26 +0200, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Is it ok if I change CMF 1.6 (currently in beta) to use the logging
> module instead of zLOG?
> zLOG spouts lots of warnings under Zope 2.10 and this sucks.
+1
--
Rocky Burt
ServerZen Software -- http://www.serverzen.com
News About
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Is it ok if I change CMF 1.6 (currently in beta) to use the logging
module instead of zLOG?
zLOG spouts lots of warnings under Zope 2.10 and this sucks.
+1 if you forward port the fixes ;)
(see http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/439)
Cheers, Yuppie
__