-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 10, 2008, at 10:30 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> If there are no objections I'll basically revert and remove the
> original checkin in time for CMF 2.2.0:
>
> http://svn.zope.org/?rev=38594&view=rev
Small clarification: I'll revert the CMFCore ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 6, 2008, at 10:59 , Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 11:32, Hanno Schlichting
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But no matter what the code does, nobody is using it. I think it's an
>> artifact from the early "Zope 3 everywhere"
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 11:32, Hanno Schlichting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought the actions it emits trough the action providers API are
> old-style ones and it doesn't register itself in portal_actions as an
> action provider...
No, you have to do that if you want to use ut.
> But no matt
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>
> On Oct 4, 2008, at 17:28 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>
>> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>>> Is anyone actually using the portal_fiveactions tool and the supposed
>>> bridging between Z3 menus and CMF actions it is promising? I'm
>>> wondering if it's dead wood we're carrying arou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 4, 2008, at 17:28 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> Is anyone actually using the portal_fiveactions tool and the supposed
>> bridging between Z3 menus and CMF actions it is promising? I'm
>> wondering if it's dead wood we'r
Am 04.10.2008 um 16:34 schrieb Jens Vagelpohl:
> Is anyone actually using the portal_fiveactions tool and the supposed
> bridging between Z3 menus and CMF actions it is promising? I'm
> wondering if it's dead wood we're carrying around since it really has
> not been touched much after the initial
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 4, 2008, at 17:28 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> Is anyone actually using the portal_fiveactions tool and the supposed
>> bridging between Z3 menus and CMF actions it is promising? I'm
>> wondering if it's dead wood we'r
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> Is anyone actually using the portal_fiveactions tool and the supposed
> bridging between Z3 menus and CMF actions it is promising? I'm
> wondering if it's dead wood we're carrying around since it really has
> not been touched much after the initial import:
I think nobody is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is anyone actually using the portal_fiveactions tool and the supposed
bridging between Z3 menus and CMF actions it is promising? I'm
wondering if it's dead wood we're carrying around since it really has
not been touched much after the initial imp
