Hi
,
are the missing CMF Tests only temporary or is there a need for a new
source of test reports?
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:00 AM, CMF tests summarizer wrote:
> This is the summary for test reports received on the
> cmf-tests list between 2013-03-02 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-03-03 00:00:00 UTC:
>
This is the summary for test reports received on the
cmf-tests list between 2013-03-02 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-03-03 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/z
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2013 04:54 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> (e.g. the time spent managing svn.zope.org; the cost of bandwidth)
> that can be better spent elsewhere (e.g. working on Zope/CMF)
FWIW<, I doubt that those costs are measurable in any significant sense:
Hi,
On 3 March 2013 18:45, Andreas Jung wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> yuppie wrote:
>
> >
> >> You do realise it's:
> >>
> >> a) free (for us) b) decentralised
> >
> > What do you mean by "it"? What by "free"? What is "decentralised"?
>
I mean, there's no tan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
>
>> You do realise it's:
>>
>> a) free (for us) b) decentralised
>
> What do you mean by "it"? What by "free"? What is "decentralised"?
> Why do your points a) and b) make supporting GitHub Inc. a good
> decision?
>
> GitHub Inc.
Hi!
Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 2 March 2013 16:18, yuppie
mailto:y.2013-E2EsyBC0hj3+aS/vkh9...@public.gmane.org>> wrote:
Yes. I have objections.
I'd like to keep contributing to CMF. But I'm not going to support
GitHub Inc. by using its services
Seriously?
Yes.
You do realise i
Am 02.03.2013, 21:42 Uhr, schrieb Martin Aspeli :
Seriously?
I can understand reservations about the move and did indeed voice my own
at the time.
You do realise it's:
a) free (for us)
"There's no such thing as a free lunch."™
b) decentralised
If the shit really does hit the fan the
