[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 5 OK

2010-06-17 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Wed Jun 16 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Thu Jun 17 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from CMF Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Wed Jun 16 21:43:30 EDT 2010 URL:

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt - made sure we don't call views inadvertently

2010-06-17 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yvo Schubbe wrote: Log message for revision 113583: - made sure we don't call views inadvertently Changed: U Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt -=- Modified:

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt - made sure we don't call views inadvertently

2010-06-17 Thread yuppie
Tres Seaver wrote: Modified: Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt === --- Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt 2010-06-17

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt - made sure we don't call views inadvertently

2010-06-17 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yuppie wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: How was this template working at all before? If it was, do we have a backwards-compatibility issue on these nocall; changes -- that is, will this change break compatibility with a still-supported older version of