Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
There aren't any specific goals for these third-dot-releases per se,
including an explicit goal that CMF 1.5.2 must work with Zope 2.8. It
is desirable, yes, but won't hold up a final release until someone
finds it urgent enough to do something about it. Remember,
I'd also be happy to chip in if someone points me at specific collector
issues.
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 08:39 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 29 Jun 2005, at 08:29, Christian Heimes wrote:
I made Plone 2.1 working with CMF 1.5 and 2.8 and I finally got the
people convinced to move to the
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
efge
- CMFSetup doesn't correctly detect DCWorkflow on export,
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/298
gregweb
-
yuppie wrote:
2.) CMFBTreeFolder is broken and should be moved to the CMF
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1813
At least CMFBTreeFolder is working again. I have fixed it in Zope 2.8,
trunk and the standalone version from cvs. It's not a perfect solution
but we have time to move the CMF
Hello,
I wonder what permissions are needed to allow Anonymous to create content?
I've created an archetype component with a custom Add Action Record
Content permission. This is needed because content (action records) is
created by Anonymous users. Their ability to add this content is
Solved: needed to get new FactoryTool.py from svn (collector: 3688)
Petri Savolainen wrote:
Hello,
I wonder what permissions are needed to allow Anonymous to create content?
I've created an archetype component with a custom Add Action Record
Content permission. This is needed because content
