[Zope-CMF] CMF Collector: Open Issues

2006-01-05 Thread tseaver
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector (http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF). Assigned and Open efge - CMFSetup: provide non-ascii im- and exports, [Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/292 jens - Discussion replies removal,

[Zope-CMF] Re: Bug when removing state in DCWorkflow

2006-01-05 Thread Raphael Ritz
Tres Seaver wrote: [..] Objects which have a no-longer-sane review_state have *never* had reasonable behavior: the workflow engine *can't* compute what to do with them. They have no transitions (which is why the workflow actions are gone), and they can't be fixed by the Update Security

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: [z3-five] Re: CMFonFive and CMF 1.6

2006-01-05 Thread Lennart Regebro
this makes sense. i'm -1 on the final CMFonFive piece landing in CMF 1.6 itself, though. the original scope for CMF 1.6 was CMF 1.5 + GenericSetup, i don't see a compelling reason to complicate things by expanding that scope. if CMFonFive stays separate, then you can code it to support

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: [z3-five] Re: CMFonFive and CMF 1.6

2006-01-05 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
On 5 Jan 2006, at 09:40, Lennart Regebro wrote: this makes sense. i'm -1 on the final CMFonFive piece landing in CMF 1.6 itself, though. the original scope for CMF 1.6 was CMF 1.5 + GenericSetup, i don't see a compelling reason to complicate things by expanding that scope. if CMFonFive

[Zope-CMF] Re: GenericSetup: allowed_container_types

2006-01-05 Thread Florent Guillaume
On 5 Jan 2006, at 12:05, yuppie wrote: I can't find any code for purge=False. This is only on the trunk. The _importNode methods of ActionCategoryNodeAdapter and ActionNodeAdapter look for an optional 'purge' attribute. Ah ok, I had looked at CMF 1.6 only. Workflow bindings don't need

[Zope-CMF] Re: Bug when removing state in DCWorkflow

2006-01-05 Thread Florent Guillaume
Raphael Ritz wrote: Objects which have a no-longer-sane review_state have *never* had reasonable behavior: the workflow engine *can't* compute what to do with them. They have no transitions (which is why the workflow actions are gone), and they can't be fixed by the Update Security button,

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: [z3-five] Re: CMFonFive and CMF 1.6

2006-01-05 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 1/5/06, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry I didn't follow this discussion closely, so you want to merge the last remnants of CMFonFive into CMF 1.6 and 2.0, is that the suggestion? It's already merged into CMF 2.0 (although it's not actuall *working* yet. ;) ) So it's only 1.6

[Zope-CMF] Re: Bug when removing state in DCWorkflow

2006-01-05 Thread Alexander Limi
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:07:07 +0100, Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: Objects which have a no-longer-sane review_state have *never* had reasonable behavior: the workflow engine *can't* compute what to do with them. They have no transitions (which is why the

[Zope-CMF] CMFPhoto + Album broken in 2.1.1

2006-01-05 Thread Ignacio Valdes
Is there a fix for: When installing CMFPhoto and Album from Add/Remove Products, it says the product is broken with the following Install log transcript: 2006-01-05 09:23:33 failed: Traceback (most recent call last): File /opt/zope/2.8.4/Products/CMFQuickInstallerTool/QuickInstallerTool.py,

[Zope-CMF] Re: CMFPhoto + Album broken in 2.1.1

2006-01-05 Thread Raphael Ritz
Ignacio Valdes wrote: Is there a fix for: When installing CMFPhoto and Album from Add/Remove Products, it says the product is broken with the following Install log transcript: Your Plone is too new ;-) Plone doesn't have nor use the navigation_properties since 2.0 (about two years ago)

[Zope-CMF] Plone add item restriction based on context/group/role?

2006-01-05 Thread Ignacio Valdes
Hello all, I would like to restrict what a Plone user can add based on the folder they are currently navigating in. For instance, I have a folder named My Protocols. I only want a user that is a member of the group 'Staff' to be able to add 1) folders. 2) CMFQuestion questionnaires and 3) a

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: CMFPhoto + Album broken in 2.1.1

2006-01-05 Thread Ignacio Valdes
Ut-oh. The Add/Remove Products tells me ' This product has been upgraded, click here to reinstall. Filesystem version is' but when I click it gives: Site error This site encountered an error trying to fulfill your request. The errors were: Error Type AttributeError Error Value

[Zope-CMF] Simple way of CMFQuestion questionnaire as a Add item?

2006-01-05 Thread Ignacio Valdes
Hello again all, I have created a nice CMFQuestion questionnaire that I would like to be available on the Add item dropdown. So instead of adding a generic questionnaire from Add item, you would be able to add an already populated questionnaire. Is there a simple way of doing this? Can you

[Zope-CMF] Re: Bug when removing state in DCWorkflow

2006-01-05 Thread Florent Guillaume
Alexander Limi wrote: Florent Guillaume: That's been the intent of the code all along: when you query the workflow tool and ask it for the state of an object, this is passed along to DCWorkflow, and if the object doesn't have a state anymore the initial state is returned. However if you

Re: [Zope-CMF] Plone add item restriction based on context/group/role?

2006-01-05 Thread Ignacio Valdes
I've found the partial answer through the 'Settings...' on the drop down only it doesn't seem to want to save my restrictions. -- IV On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:46:28 -0600 Ignacio Valdes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I would like to restrict what a Plone user can add based on the folder

[Zope-CMF] Re: Plone add item restriction based on context/group/role?

2006-01-05 Thread Raphael Ritz
Ignacio Valdes wrote: I've found the partial answer through the 'Settings...' on the drop down only it doesn't seem to want to save my restrictions. This 'Settings ...' option is actually purely Plone/ATCT specific. You might have better chances to get an answer to your question on the

[Zope-CMF] Re: CMFPhoto + Album broken in 2.1.1

2006-01-05 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
Ignacio Valdes wrote: Ut-oh. The Add/Remove Products tells me ' This product has been upgraded, click here to reinstall. Filesystem version is' but when I click it gives: Site error This site encountered an error trying to fulfill your request. The errors were: Error Type

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Plone add item restriction based on context/group/role?

2006-01-05 Thread Ignacio Valdes
Ah-hah! I was wondering if such lists existed: http://plone.org/contact/index_html/?searchterm=plone-users%20list Wish there was a tab for this on plone.org -- IV On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 18:12:19 +0100 Raphael Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ignacio Valdes wrote: I've found the partial answer

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Plone add item restriction based on context/group/role?

2006-01-05 Thread J Cameron Cooper
Ignacio Valdes wrote: Ah-hah! I was wondering if such lists existed: http://plone.org/contact/index_html/?searchterm=plone-users%20list Wish there was a tab for this on plone.org Your wish is granted. It's the contact tab, though that doesn't seem like the best name. --jcc

[Zope-CMF] Re: [z3-five] Re: CMFonFive and CMF 1.6

2006-01-05 Thread Rob Miller
Lennart Regebro wrote: this makes sense. i'm -1 on the final CMFonFive piece landing in CMF 1.6 itself, though. the original scope for CMF 1.6 was CMF 1.5 + GenericSetup, i don't see a compelling reason to complicate things by expanding that scope. if CMFonFive stays separate, then you can

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: [z3-five] Re: CMFonFive and CMF 1.6

2006-01-05 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 1/5/06, Rob Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: maybe i'm being dense, but i don't see how merging the code into the CMF core improves this. if i'm understanding this correctly, you wouldn't be increasing the number of supported combinations at all; No, I'd just get rid of a whole lot of

[Zope-CMF] Re: [z3-five] Re: CMFonFive and CMF 1.6

2006-01-05 Thread Rob Miller
Lennart Regebro wrote: And CMF 1.6 already has more changes that just GenericSetup, some of which are already causing me other headaches. which are these? the most significant changes are in the TypesTool, and this was done in order to achieve more parity btn the 1.6 and 2.0 site creation

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: [z3-five] Re: CMFonFive and CMF 1.6

2006-01-05 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 1/5/06, Rob Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lennart Regebro wrote: And CMF 1.6 already has more changes that just GenericSetup, some of which are already causing me other headaches. which are these? the most significant changes are in the TypesTool, and this was done in order to