[Zope-CMF] CMF Collector: Open Issues

2006-07-27 Thread tseaver
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector (http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF). Assigned and Open jens - "CachingPolicyManager: Support OFS.Cache.CacheManager", [Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/408 mhammond - "Windows Developm

[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] RFC: rethinking GenericSetup extension profiles

2006-07-27 Thread yuppie
Hi Tres! Tres Seaver wrote: I'll note that my original architecture document[1] contemplated two kinds of "add-on" profiles: - ExtensionProfiles could register *new* kinds of steps, as well as making non-destructive insertions to the configuration created by a baseline profile. -

[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] RFC: rethinking GenericSetup extension profiles

2006-07-27 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 7/26/06, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Even this small difference doesn't exist. The profile it is diffed from is just a normal dependency. OK. I'm trying to come up with errors in this plan, but I fail. The closest i come is that you will need to have different extension profiles for di

[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] RFC: rethinking GenericSetup extension profiles

2006-07-27 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yuppie wrote: > Hi Tres! > > > Tres Seaver wrote: >> >> I'll note that my original architecture document[1] contemplated two >> kinds of "add-on" profiles: >> >> - ExtensionProfiles could register *new* kinds of steps, as well as >> making non-