The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
jens
- "CachingPolicyManager: Support OFS.Cache.CacheManager",
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/408
mhammond
- "Windows Developm
Hi,
I'm trying to investigate a problem where the CPM is adding cache
headers to a response for the wrong object. I can reproduce it in plain
CMF as follows:
1. Add two filesystem zpts:
output_page_1:
==
test page
Here is the title
output_page_2:
==
Here i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
1. Add two filesystem zpts:
output_page_1:
==
test page
Here is the title
output_page_2:
==
Here is the subtitle from template 2
2. Add a rule to the cpm as follows:
id: "template_test"
predicate: view.endswith(
Miles Waller wrote at 2006-10-11 16:34 +0100:
> ...
>output_page_2:
>==
>Here is the subtitle from template 2
>
>2. Add a rule to the cpm as follows:
>
>id: "template_test"
>predicate: view.endswith('_2')
>etag: string:"template_test"
>
>3. Make a request for /output_page_1
>
>4. Not
My question is, does this count as a bug?
I'm not sure this can be called a bug. It is true (and perfectly
normal) that rendering a filesystem page template will always call the
CPM. You're rendering both here. Since output_page_2 is rendered last
as it's calles from output_page_1 the rul
