Hi Miles!
Miles wrote:
> This change is now done, and checked in on a branch.
Great!
> As there are no adapters in CMFCore at the moment, there's no precedent
> to follow. So:
>
> - The multi-adapter is registered in a new file, implements.zcml
Why did you choose the name implements.zcml?
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Mon Mar 16 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Mar 17 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Mon Mar 16 21:51:29 EDT 2009
URL: ht
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback! I think we're pretty much there with this.
>> As there are no adapters in CMFCore at the moment, there's no precedent
>> to follow. So:
>>
>> - The multi-adapter is registered in a new file, implements.zcml
>
> Why did you choose the name implements.zcml? I can'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
>> - The TraversingEventZCMLLayer now also loads implements.zcml, as the
>> correct behaviour of both the catalog and the adapter class is required
>> for the folder tests to pass.
>>
>> - The CatalogTool tests set up the adapter a
