[Zope-CMF] Re: RFC: PAS and the (non?) future of members

2006-02-03 Thread Rob Miller
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 07:04:30 +0100, robert rottermann wrote: rob, we German native speakers are used to word our opinions much more directly that Americans. I believe for a German speaker there is not a trace of insult in what jens expressed. understood. i'm sorry for overreacting. i guess

[Zope-CMF] Re: RFC: PAS and the (non?) future of members

2006-02-03 Thread Florent Guillaume
Rob Miller wrote: i'm wondering if it's not time to rethink the entire idea of members as they currently exist in CMF. members were originally a necessary evil, because the user folder implementation of users didn't allow for enough flexibility to support CMF's needs. now, however, PAS makes

[Zope-CMF] Re: RFC: PAS and the (non?) future of members

2006-02-02 Thread Rob Miller
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:14:15 +, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 2 Feb 2006, at 15:35, Rob Miller wrote: even if the content-based plug-ins are not desireable, i think it's still worth investigating the use of PAS and the idea of deprecating the member/user duality altogether. anyone else

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: RFC: PAS and the (non?) future of members

2006-02-02 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
On 2 Feb 2006, at 23:01, Rob Miller wrote: On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:14:15 +, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 2 Feb 2006, at 15:35, Rob Miller wrote: even if the content-based plug-ins are not desireable, i think it's still worth investigating the use of PAS and the idea of deprecating the