Hi,
>
> o +1 on 'container/@@add/typename'
>
this is my suggestion as well
regards, robert
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> This mail has been lying around for a while because I'm not sure it's
> the right way to start the discussion. But now I'll give it a try. Maybe
> the sprinters find some time to discuss this:
>
> One result of the "Add f
Charlie Clark wrote:
>> b) for URLs like http://www.example.org/guestbook/+/Message
>>
>> The '+' view already implements IPublishTraverse, so we can't change
>> traversal using an adapter. The only solution I can see is to replace
>> the '+' view by a customized version.
>>
>>
>> c) for URLs like
Charlie Clark wrote:
> Am 14.09.2008 um 13:30 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
>
>> Zope 3 does use IAdding for zope.app.form/zope.formlib based add
>> views;
>> With z3c.form, IAdding support is optional, but the preference is to
>> just use views like @@add-foo.html (note: I hate the .html convention;
>
Am 14.09.2008 um 13:30 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
> Zope 3 does use IAdding for zope.app.form/zope.formlib based add
> views;
> With z3c.form, IAdding support is optional, but the preference is to
> just use views like @@add-foo.html (note: I hate the .html convention;
> it is superfluous and looks
Am 14.09.2008 um 12:26 schrieb yuppie:
> This mail has been lying around for a while because I'm not sure it's
> the right way to start the discussion. But now I'll give it a try.
> Maybe
> the sprinters find some time to discuss this:
I had to leave yesterday evening... it would have been gre
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> b) for URLs like http://www.example.org/guestbook/+/Message
>>
>> The '+' view already implements IPublishTraverse, so we can't change
>> traversal using an adapter. The only solution I can see is to replace
>> the '+' view by a customized version.
>
> This looks like a g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 14, 2008, at 12:26 , yuppie wrote:
> This mail has been lying around for a while because I'm not sure it's
> the right way to start the discussion. But now I'll give it a try.
> Maybe
> the sprinters find some time to discuss this:
We're dow
