Am 16.05.2009 um 10:58 schrieb Jens Vagelpohl: > I haven't chosen his particular implementation to reach that goal, but > one that IMHO fits better with the direction we're going, by using a > named factory utility. If no suitable utility is registered, the > implementation falls back to the hardcoded MemberData class.
+10 ;-) Charlie -- Charlie Clark Helmholtzstr. 20 Düsseldorf D- 40215 Tel: +49-211-938-5360 GSM: +49-178-782-6226 _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
