On 3 Feb 2006, at 01:52, Rob Miller wrote:
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:38:07 +, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 3 Feb 2006, at 00:31, Rob Miller wrote:
I mean sticking Plone-only stuff onto something that's a simple
folder and should be completely agnostic of how it is used.
oh, i see. did i imply that Plone-only behaviour should be
the CMF? i'm not detecting some prejudice that might possibly be
causing certain readers to jump to conclusions about my proposal,
Did I say CMF? No, I did not. I said PAS.
whatever. i still don't think that justifies a back-handed insult
there was nothing in my proposal that implied that i wanted to move
inappropriate behaviour anywhere into the stack. or maybe i should
be prepared for random snide comments to be the response to every
proposal, since i happen to have come from the Plone community?
I don't see how a simple admonition to keep PAS itself usage-agnostic
is supposed to be an insult. I only want to prevent all kinds of
strange convenience APIs to appear on it which the current Plone
versions expect on the user folder, things like
getLocalRolesForDisplay or isLocalRoleAcquired.
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests