[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 5 OK

2010-06-17 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Wed Jun 16 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Thu Jun 17 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from CMF Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Wed Jun 16 21:43:30 EDT 2010 URL: ht

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt - made sure we don't call views inadvertently

2010-06-17 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yvo Schubbe wrote: > Log message for revision 113583: > - made sure we don't call views inadvertently > > Changed: > U > Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt > > -=- > Modified: > Products.CMFC

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt - made sure we don't call views inadvertently

2010-06-17 Thread yuppie
Tres Seaver wrote: >> Modified: >> Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt >> === >> --- >> Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt >> 20

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt - made sure we don't call views inadvertently

2010-06-17 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yuppie wrote: > Tres Seaver wrote: >> How was this template working at all before? If it was, do we have a >> backwards-compatibility issue on these nocall; changes -- that is, will >> this change break compatibility with a still-supported older vers