Re: [Zope-CMF] Releasing GenericSetup 1.5.0b1

2009-09-24 Thread yuppie
handler improvements in GenericSetup depend on 2.0dev. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/+bug/388380 Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf

[Zope-CMF] CMF 2.2.0-alpha: getIcon

2009-11-16 Thread yuppie
complicated for the default, I propose to add a new method: getIconURL() getIcon() and icon() should get the same behavior as they had in CMF 2.1. Any thoughts? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF 2.2.0-beta reminder

2009-12-03 Thread yuppie
Hi Charlie! Charlie Clark wrote: Am 02.12.2009, 20:51 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de: -1 The real issue here is the fact that the permission argument of the adapter directive is not supported in Zope 2. Otherwise we could simply use this: adapter name

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF 2.2.0-beta reminder

2009-12-04 Thread yuppie
Hi Charlie! yuppie wrote: Charlie Clark wrote: Am 02.12.2009, 20:51 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2009-E2EsyBC0hj3+aS/vkh9...@public.gmane.org: Using the class directive instead is just a workaround for a generic problem that needs a generic solution, not a new addView directive. I have to agree

Re: [Zope-CMF] [Checkins] SVN: Products.CMFCore/trunk/ - fixed Zope 2.12 compatibility

2009-12-27 Thread yuppie
support for Zope 2.12.2 if 2.12.3 is released. It's always recommended to use the latest bugfix release of Zope. On the other hand we would just need a few try except imports to keep BBB. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF

Re: [Zope-CMF] Making GenericSetup property import less strict

2010-02-16 Thread yuppie
and CMF 2.2 has some migration code that converts this to an 'icon_expr' property. HTH, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.GenericSetup/trunk/Products/GenericSetup/ Don't bomb out with an AttributeError when encoding an attribute

2010-03-03 Thread yuppie
around invalid data we should make sure only valid data is written to the DOM. AFAICS MailHostXMLAdapter._exportNode is the right place to fix this. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope

Re: [Zope-CMF] GenericSetup creates exports with bad directory permissions

2010-03-03 Thread yuppie
into that directory. This is with python 2.6, so there might have been changes to the tarfile module that cause this. yuppie, you did some changes in Products/GenericSetup/context.py on 13 December that might be related. Does this behaviour ring a bell for you? Aha, if I revert to revision

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-04-01 Thread yuppie
an easy way to create .pot files for CMF. Maybe we should not run those parts by default. Either by removing them from parts= of the [buildout] section or by moving them to a separate .cfg file. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: CMF.buildout/trunk/src/ Don't use http:// externals for CMF externals.

2010-04-01 Thread yuppie
CMF.buildout have already Subversion =1.5 available. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: CMF.buildout/trunk/src/ Don't use http:// externals for CMF externals.

2010-04-01 Thread yuppie
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 4/1/10 12:10 , yuppie wrote: IIRC the general policy for the Zope repository is to switch to relative externals after the release of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, but I guess all people using CMF.buildout have already Subversion=1.5 available. Huh? Since when do we make

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: CMF.buildout/trunk/src/ Don't use http:// externals for CMF externals.

2010-04-01 Thread yuppie
Hi! Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 4/1/10 12:28 , yuppie wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 4/1/10 12:10 , yuppie wrote: IIRC the general policy for the Zope repository is to switch to relative externals after the release of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, but I guess all people using CMF.buildout have already

Re: [Zope-CMF] More browser views

2010-04-07 Thread yuppie
should add them to CMFDefault? I guess they need just a few changes to be ready for checkin. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf

Re: [Zope-CMF] More browser views

2010-04-07 Thread yuppie
address. No changes required to CookieCrumber? Where is auto_login_page used? A quick look at the code tells me it is only used for the unauth redirect. And that seems to be generally broken, at least on trunk :( Never noticed that. Doesn't work with my view either. Cheers, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] Portal type actions

2010-04-09 Thread yuppie
code for ever was not my plan. Cheers Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] More browser views

2010-04-12 Thread yuppie
for testing. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 2 Failed

2010-04-15 Thread yuppie
these tests so it can go back in. UniqueObject is derived from ImmutableId. I think you have to set this for the class: id = 'cookie_authentication' Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 2 Failed

2010-04-19 Thread yuppie
to be a much more appropriate solution. I'll write a prototype and report back. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports

[Zope-CMF] [dev] Unauthorized handling - a proposal

2010-04-20 Thread yuppie
be supported. CookieCrumbler and therefore CMFCore will loose the redirect feature. If there are no objections, I'll check in that change on CMF trunk. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] Unauthorized handling - a proposal

2010-04-20 Thread yuppie
that doesn't mean you spend more time answering my questions than it would take to do the work! :-) I'm only working on the login process. Could you perhaps start working on the logout process before we bring everything together? Cheers, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] Minor cleanup in browsers

2010-04-21 Thread yuppie
, subobjects and other content on the same page or on different pages. I personally use just object/edit - @@edit.html and a modified @@edit.html that allows to edit Title and Description as well. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF

Re: [Zope-CMF] Unicode for ReST?

2010-04-26 Thread yuppie
. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

[Zope-CMF] [dev] CookieCrumbler cleanup

2010-06-14 Thread yuppie
=1 behavior is implemented, so I can't see a reason why we should set the retry parameter. PAS also works without that feature. I propose to remove that feature completely. Please let me know if there are any objections. Cheers, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/Products/CMFCalendar/browser/templates/calendar_widgets.pt - made sure we don't call views inadvertently

2010-06-17 Thread yuppie
base class seems to have a __call__ method that did not exist before. But I didn't try to figure out what exactly changed because nocall: is anyway what we always wanted. As long as the view can't be called it doesn't make a difference, so I don't think we have a BBB issue. Cheers, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] How do you add an action in python code?

2010-06-18 Thread yuppie
the code that does the real adding (Ended up getting lost in GenericSetup browser views). Can someone give me a pointer? There is no special API. ActionCategory inherits from OFS.OrderedFolder, you can use the _setObject method. HTH, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] Member preferences

2010-06-30 Thread yuppie
to _singlestate_workflow in to22.py? See check_actions_tool/upgrade_actions_tool in to21.py. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature

Re: [Zope-CMF] Member preferences

2010-07-01 Thread yuppie
, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] Member preferences

2010-07-01 Thread yuppie
Hi! Wichert Akkerman wrote: On 7/1/10 11:37 , yuppie wrote: Why are they CVS-era fossils? What special value did they add in the CVS world? I always thought we use the Id keyword because CVS or SVN metadata is not always available. In tarball or egg releases that kind of metadata

Re: [Zope-CMF] Member preferences

2010-07-01 Thread yuppie
. And the IRC meeting would indeed be a good place for making coding style decisions. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature

Re: [Zope-CMF] Getting i18n to fire

2010-07-01 Thread yuppie
directory=./ /configure HTH, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] Test setup problems with Zope 2.13

2010-07-22 Thread yuppie
. Cheers, Yuppie Index: Zope2/src/Testing/ZopeTestCase/ZopeLite.py === --- Zope2/src/Testing/ZopeTestCase/ZopeLite.py (revision 114921) +++ Zope2/src/Testing/ZopeTestCase/ZopeLite.py (working copy) @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ from

Re: [Zope-CMF] Test setup problems with Zope 2.13

2010-07-22 Thread yuppie
yuppie wrote: +...@layer.onsetup def installPackage(name, quiet=0): '''Installs a registered Python package.''' Oops! For some unknown reason @layer.onsetup was explicitly removed here: http://svn.zope.org/?view=revrev=89898 ???, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] Test setup problems with Zope 2.13

2010-07-27 Thread yuppie
again. Both CMF 2.2 and CMF trunk against Zope 2.13. I guess some more changes should be reverted. There is at least a ZopeTestCase.installPackage('OFS') in the FunctionalLayer of CMFCalendar. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope

Re: [Zope-CMF] Test setup problems with Zope 2.13

2010-07-28 Thread yuppie
works for all CMF content types without adding them to the ZMI add menu. We just can't use five:registerClass in OFS/OFSP because it doesn't support oldstyle constructors and legacy methods. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF

[Zope-CMF] CMF vs. CMF.buildout

2010-08-05 Thread yuppie
. People will need some time to switch their checkouts to the new locations. But after a while we can delete CMF.buildout completely. Any thoughts? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF vs. CMF.buildout

2010-08-05 Thread yuppie
) - CHANGES.txt, EXTERNALS.txt and __init__.py And these files might still contain some useful information, but need to be cleaned up: - INSTALL.txt and INSTALL_SVN.txt - README.txt Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF vs. CMF.buildout

2010-08-05 Thread yuppie
Hi! Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 8/5/10 16:52 , yuppie wrote: Charlie Clark wrote: I'm actively abstaining as while I understand the need to clean things up, I'm not sure I understand the whole context (my lack of understanding rather than any lack of explanation). CMF is actually empty, isn't

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF vs. CMF.buildout

2010-08-05 Thread yuppie
for them. CMF.buildout sounds like it would be the official sanctioned buildout for the CMF. How should they know it is a developer convenience? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF 2.1 releases

2010-09-23 Thread yuppie
as possible, I'm planning to get some more stuff over the next few days. Can we wait until next Wednesday (bug day?) Are you sure you want to make these changes in CMF 2.1? Jens is not talking about CMF 2.2 or trunk. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF

[Zope-CMF] CMF dev buildouts

2010-09-23 Thread yuppie
as prefix. AFAICS about 20% of their content is still useful, so I did not delete them. But it would be nice if someone would clean them up. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

Re: [Zope-CMF] Trouble adding a new site

2010-12-08 Thread yuppie
just have a bare CMFSite object without any tools. HTH, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 4 OK, 3 Unknown

2010-12-27 Thread yuppie
/bin/python ./bin/test Should now be: /usr/local/python2.6/bin/python -S ./bin/test or just: ./bin/test Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF dev buildouts

2011-01-13 Thread yuppie
and buildout files on each branch of each Product? Who is using and maintaining them? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF dev buildouts

2011-01-13 Thread yuppie
makes sure bootstrap.py and buildout.cfg are up to date. You just did have to update buildout.cfg on CMFCore trunk. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net

Re: [Zope-CMF] TypesTool and contruction permissions

2011-01-25 Thread yuppie
. Is this correct ? I'm afraid you can use five:registerClass only once per class. The directive modifies the class. meta_type to class is a 1:1 relationship. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope

[Zope-CMF] [dev] working on the trunk

2011-01-26 Thread yuppie
small issues. But the bigger issues still exist. Based on what I encountered I wrote this small guide: http://svn.zope.org/*checkout*/CMF/trunk/CODINGSTYLE.txt Please keep the the trunk stable and use your own branch for unfinished changes. Cheers, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCore/trunk/Products/CMFCore/ Removed os.path.walk call in windows development mode

2011-02-03 Thread yuppie
people still develop on FAT32 partitions. Maybe there is an easy way to detect the file system? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCore/trunk/Products/CMFCore/ Removed os.path.walk call in windows development mode

2011-02-03 Thread yuppie
yuppie wrote: AFAIK this is primarily a file system issue, not an operating system issue. 'Last modified' time is updated on NTFS, but not on FAT32. Not sure what we need to support: I guess everybody is working with Windows versions that support NTFS, but maybe some people still develop

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCore/trunk/Products/CMFCore/ Removed os.path.walk call in windows development mode

2011-02-07 Thread yuppie
yuppie wrote: yuppie wrote: DebugModeTests have been disabled by default. Now I see 3 errors on FAT32 and one error on NTFS: Error in test test_DeleteAddEditMethod (Products.CMFCore.tests.test_DirectoryView.DebugModeTests) Traceback (most recent call last): File ...\Python26\lib

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCore/trunk/Products/CMFCore/ Removed os.path.walk call in windows development mode

2011-02-07 Thread yuppie
know. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

[Zope-CMF] [dev] wrapping users - a proposal

2011-02-18 Thread yuppie
that on the trunk. IUser is only available in Zope 2.13.2+, so I'll have to make that Zope version required for CMF trunk. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 6 OK, 1 Unknown

2011-02-21 Thread yuppie
This buildout was moved to CMF/branches/2.1-zope210. Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux This buildout was moved to CMF/branches/2.1-zope211. Please make sure you use the new locations before I delete the old ones. Cheers, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] wrapping users - a proposal

2011-02-22 Thread yuppie
Hi! yuppie wrote: I propose to split this up into a persistent MemberData object that is just used for storing member data and a new non-persistent MemberAdapter that provides all the methods currently provided by MemberData objects. Done: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=120512view=rev

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] wrapping users - a proposal

2011-02-22 Thread yuppie
defined interface for default member properties. So I tend to a fixed schema. People still can add custom properties, but they would have to use getProperty or override MemberAdapter. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.GenericSetup/trunk/ Refactored global registries to use global named utilities.

2011-03-11 Thread yuppie
cleanUpImportSteps and cleanUpExportSteps? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] RFC: Removing svn:externals from buildouts

2011-03-25 Thread yuppie
in Eclipse. But if it works for everybody else and the nightly tests don't break I'm fine with replacing the svn:externals. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https

[Zope-CMF] [dev] member data - a small proposal

2011-07-28 Thread yuppie
the related MemberDataTool properties undeletable (only the 6 basic ones - of course you can still change and delete all property values and you can add or remove other properties) Any objections? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] member data - a small proposal

2011-07-28 Thread yuppie
work. You don't have to use member.getProperty('email', '') and in a next step attribute access (member.email) could be implemented reliable. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMF - changed property modes to 'w' and added 'fullname' property

2011-07-28 Thread yuppie
it differently in just one place: - Plone uses string for 'fullname' - If we add a 'fullname' Python property to IMemberData, it can still return the decoded value. In CMF 2.3 IMemberData objects are just adapters and the property values are stored somewhere else. Cheers, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

2011-08-23 Thread yuppie
powers. It looks like all the doctests are failing. Charlie Zope trunk is broken, it has similar failures and errors: https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-August/048589.html Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https

[Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities

2011-09-12 Thread yuppie
code. But that never happened. So these tools and all tools depending on these tools are still not converted. I propose to use 'five.globalrequest' instead of self.REQUEST inside tools. AFAICS that allows to convert *all* tools into utilities. What do you think? Cheers, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities

2011-09-12 Thread yuppie
Hi! Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On Sep 12, 2011, at 11:52 , yuppie wrote: I propose to use 'five.globalrequest' instead of self.REQUEST inside tools. AFAICS that allows to convert *all* tools into utilities. Why would you want to add a dependency for 3 lines of code? All that package does

[Zope-CMF] [dev] CatalogTool as utility

2011-09-19 Thread yuppie
have a REQUEST argument that is used instead of self.REQUEST? Any kind of feedback and help is welcome. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CatalogTool as utility

2011-09-19 Thread yuppie
? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CatalogTool as utility

2011-09-20 Thread yuppie
% backwards compatible. The zope.globalrequest dependency could be made optional. Do we really need an extra ZCatalog branch for that? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CatalogTool as utility

2011-09-21 Thread yuppie
release? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CatalogTool as utility

2011-09-22 Thread yuppie
for that. Zope 2.13 can use it without five.globalrequest. See http://svn.zope.org/?rev=122892view=rev Is that ok? Should I add an explicit extra in the setup.py of Products.ZCatalog? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org

Re: [Zope-CMF] Switching to Chameleon

2011-09-29 Thread yuppie
the effort in to port Plone to CMF 2.3 in time for Plone 5. Who ever that is: The upgrade steps for CMFDefault might give some hints what needs to be upgraded. And you are always welcome to ask questions on this list if you have trouble with upgrading. Cheers, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] working on the trunk

2011-09-29 Thread yuppie
, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] working on the trunk

2011-09-30 Thread yuppie
. Wouldn't it be better to use datetime internally? You already need an upgrade step for SyndicationInformation. Writing an additional upgrade step for SyndicationTool wouldn't be much extra work. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] working on the trunk

2011-10-04 Thread yuppie
current adapter to provide attribute access to an Annotations dictionary? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] working on the trunk

2011-10-05 Thread yuppie
is registered correctly? Are you trying to use zope.annotation.factory? Last time I checked that didn't work with Zope 2. But the AttributeAnnotations adapter works for me without showing anything in the ZMI. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist

Re: [Zope-CMF] Towards a 2.3 Release

2011-11-21 Thread yuppie
Hi! Charlie Clark wrote: * apparently the absolut skin can cause problems with used in combination with profiles. Yuppie, do you have any more information on this? Not sure what you mean. I had some problems getting rid of oldstyle skins completely (including main_template

Re: [Zope-CMF] 2.3

2012-03-22 Thread yuppie
) except ComponentLookupError: # BBB: fallback for CMF 2.2 instances utool = aq_get(self, 'portal_url') If you can't run the upgrades from the ZMI it might be necessary to add more fallbacks in CMF. HTH, Yuppie ___ Zope

Re: [Zope-CMF] 2.3

2012-04-03 Thread yuppie
they should be fixed instead of giving up. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] 2.3

2012-04-11 Thread yuppie
. It might be useful to write a howto for people who want to modernize their code. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug

Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 2, UNKNOWN: 2

2012-04-11 Thread yuppie
@@ MULTIPARAGRAPH_DESCRIPTION = \ '''Description: this description spans multiple lines. - + It includes a second paragraph''' I can't reproduce the other failures. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https

Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 2, UNKNOWN: 2

2012-04-24 Thread yuppie
with Zope trunk on Mac OS, Debian and FreeBSD. Today I saw these errors in one of my buildouts. I was able to fix them by improving the tear down in MembershipToolTests. Can you confirm this is fixed? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCore/branches/2.2/Products/CMFCore/ Add GenericSetup export/import support for type information action

2012-04-27 Thread yuppie
Hi Ross! Ross Patterson wrote: Log message for revision 125311: Add GenericSetup export/import support for type information action descriptions. Two questions: - Why didn't you merge this into trunk? - Why didn't you add ZMI support for descriptions? Cheers, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFCore/branches/2.2/Products/CMFCore/ Add GenericSetup export/import support for type information action

2012-05-03 Thread yuppie
import/export. In CMF all settings that can be changed by import steps can also be inspected and modified TTW. It's confusing if the Actions have additional settings that are invisible in the ZMI. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF

Re: [Zope-CMF] SVN: Products.CMFDefault/trunk/ Add dependency on zope.app.locales.

2012-08-28 Thread yuppie
in an extra if you want to be explicit? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

2012-08-28 Thread yuppie
behavior. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

[Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities

2012-09-04 Thread yuppie
) without providing any backward compatibility code for getSkinsFolderName. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports

Re: [Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-05 Thread yuppie
with it's convenient rfc822 method Removing DateTime completely has no high priority. If you need it as a formatting tool, just use it. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities

2012-09-05 Thread yuppie
that are not stored in the site root. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities

2012-09-05 Thread yuppie
Hi Laurence! Laurence Rowe wrote: On 5 September 2012 11:48, yuppie y.2012-E2EsyBC0hj3+aS/vkh9...@public.gmane.org wrote: 2.) Site root lookup: = In several tools we still assume aq_parent(aq_inner(self)) is the portal. Or other code uses the tool as context object

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities

2012-09-05 Thread yuppie
Hi! Charlie Clark wrote: Am 05.09.2012, 11:48 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de: getToolByName is no option because it is part of the machinery that should become obsolete. Not sure that is should actually ever become obsolete. Much as I am in favour of the interface-based lookup

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities

2012-09-05 Thread yuppie
Hi! Laurence Rowe wrote: On 5 September 2012 13:26, yuppie y.2012-E2EsyBC0hj3+aS/vkh9...@public.gmane.org wrote: I don't think relying on getSite() is a good idea. As you mention it doesn't always return the portal object. And the fact it is stored with the request in its context is just

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities

2012-09-05 Thread yuppie
. So if this has to be fixed inside the tools, getUtility(ISiteRoot) is sufficient. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities

2012-09-05 Thread yuppie
and what. Just a wild guess: Are you aware of the fact that five.localsitemanager just removes the RequestContainer, not the complete acquisition chain? And that CMF 2.3 adds a RequestContainer in getPortalObject()? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities

2012-09-06 Thread yuppie
, warnings, maybe even a switch for disabling the legacy behavior. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature

Re: [Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-06 Thread yuppie
Hi Charlie! Charlie Clark wrote: Am 05.09.2012, 09:07 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de: The setup of your doctest looks fine, you just have to enable syndication for the folder (app.site) to get the view. Tests landed yesterday and I also ran them with the oldstyle

Re: [Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-07 Thread yuppie
Hi Charlie! Charlie Clark wrote: Am 07.09.2012, 09:01 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de: And I have a quick and dirty view implementation for local role/sharing. Reimplementing it based on formlib would be a lot of work, so maybe I should just check in my code. As I'm not even

Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 5, UNKNOWN: 3

2012-09-11 Thread yuppie
Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2012-September/016705.html All the failures are caused by Zope changes, see this thread: https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2012-September/044791.html Cheers, Yuppie

Re: [Zope-CMF] Should object paste check FTI?

2013-01-11 Thread yuppie
returns a boolean value, _verifyObjectPaste tells you what went wrong. Maybe there should be a new method that raises errors and can be used by isConstructionAllowed and _verifyObjectPaste? Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF

Re: [Zope-CMF] Move to github?

2013-03-02 Thread yuppie
? Yes. I have objections. I'd like to keep contributing to CMF. But I'm not going to support GitHub Inc. by using its services. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See

Re: [Zope-CMF] Move to github?

2013-03-03 Thread yuppie
Hi! Martin Aspeli wrote: On 2 March 2013 16:18, yuppie y.2013-E2EsyBC0hj3+aS/vkh9...@public.gmane.org mailto:y.2013-E2EsyBC0hj3+aS/vkh9...@public.gmane.org wrote: Yes. I have objections. I'd like to keep contributing to CMF. But I'm not going to support GitHub Inc. by using its

Re: [Zope-CMF] Move to github?

2013-03-04 Thread yuppie
features GitHub is building around the repositories. I don't want to give the responsibility for the way I collaborate with other contributers into the hands of a company. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https

[Zope-CMF] [dev] CMFDefault: renaming type action urls

2013-05-13 Thread yuppie
easier. Cheers, Yuppie Types: Discussion Item, Document, Favorite, Link, News Item Action: object/view old: url_expr=string:${object_url}/discussionitem_view old: url_expr=string:${object_url}/document_view old: url_expr=string:${object_url}/favorite_view old: url_expr=string

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMFDefault: renaming type action urls

2013-05-13 Thread yuppie
/ (for News Item) Hope things are a bit clearer now. Cheers, Yuppie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

  1   2   >