[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 2 Failed

2010-05-03 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Sun May  2 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon May  3 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from CMF Tests.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED (errors=12) : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun May  2 21:52:23 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-May/012947.html

Subject: FAILED (errors=12) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun May  2 21:54:23 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-May/012948.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun May  2 21:48:22 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-May/012945.html

Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun May  2 21:50:22 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-May/012946.html

Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sun May  2 21:56:23 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-May/012949.html

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 2 Failed

2010-05-03 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

CMF Tests Summarizer wrote:
 Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
 Period Sun May  2 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon May  3 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
 There were 5 messages: 5 from CMF Tests.
 
 
 Test failures
 -
 
 Subject: FAILED (errors=12) : CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux
 From: CMF Tests
 Date: Sun May  2 21:52:23 EDT 2010
 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-May/012947.html
 
 Subject: FAILED (errors=12) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux
 From: CMF Tests
 Date: Sun May  2 21:54:23 EDT 2010
 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-May/012948.html

My bad:  I broke the 2.12 branch by backporting a fix badly from the
trunk.  They should run fine tonight.


Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkvfBt8ACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7cAACfScs54Kl0rG3edbBX0eMmYZM2
zMUAoKYD35Ss30ZeXUTHdW3O68H2o55M
=ksEJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 2 Failed

2010-04-19 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

yuppie wrote:

 After spending hours trying to understand the exception handling in 
 Zope, I think the unauth redirect code should be completely removed from 
 CookieCrumbler. An exception view seems to be a much more appropriate 
 solution. I'll write a prototype and report back.

I think you are correct:  registering appropriate exception views is the
only sane way out of that jungle.  The CookieCrumbler should get out of
the challenge business altogether.

Note that CC is largely useless already in any environment which uses a
non-default user folder at the root:  all the user folders written in
the past decade already cope with this problem better than CC.


Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkvMg9MACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ55sQCglKKJpFwt64NlceJN2gT2JRQF
ttMAnA+OE/GKqt/MKLWyZRrHwWJ5X3f6
=QdBp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 2 Failed

2010-04-15 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 15.04.2010, 15:03 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de:

 AFAICS all 3 failures were caused by that change.

Seems indeed to be the case. All better now - change committed.

 My mistake as I only tested
 against CMFCore although I don't quite understand how the import_export
 tests pass but this fails.  Removing UniqueObject as base class fixes  
 this
 so I'll commit that. Although, as I do think the CookieCrumbler should  
 be
 unique in a site I'd be interested in fixing these tests so it can go  
 back
 in.
 UniqueObject is derived from ImmutableId. I think you have to set this
 for the class:
id = 'cookie_authentication'

Okay, makes sense if the tests are patched accordingly. Need to check what  
was causing your new doctest to fail.

I'll pick this up when I've made CookieCrumbler able to handle views. The  
plan on this is

1) Proper interface for CookieCrumbler

2) Use actions for login/logout

3) Announce the deprecation (from CMF 2.4?) of the login/logout properties  
as these will be replaced by action lookups. Is there any point in  
maintaining the other properties as variables?

Charlie
-- 
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting  Research
German Office
Helmholtzstr. 20
Düsseldorf
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +49-178-782-6226
___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests