Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-10-03 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 03.10.2010, 13:58 Uhr, schrieb CMF Tests Summarizer cmf-te...@epy.co.at: Subject: FAILED (failures=3, errors=5) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Sat Oct 2 21:56:16 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-October/013606.html Mine,

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-09-25 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 25.09.2010, 13:58 Uhr, schrieb CMF Tests Summarizer cmf-te...@epy.co.at: Subject: FAILED (errors=3) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Fri Sep 24 21:54:46 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-September/013574.html Relates to two

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-09-25 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 25.09.2010, 17:05 Uhr, schrieb Charlie Clark charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu: Relates to two changes I made yesterday which should now be resolved, at least I can't reproduce them here. ah, yuppie fixed things for me. Thanks! Charlie -- Charlie Clark Managing Director Clark Consulting

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-06-27 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 27.06.2010, 13:58 Uhr, schrieb CMF Tests Summarizer cmf-te...@epy.co.at: Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Sat Jun 26 21:52:14 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2010-June/013216.html My fault - wrong

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-04-01 Thread yuppie
Hi! Tres Seaver wrote: I also don't know why the 'instance' and 'i18n*' parts are configured in these buildouts -- does somebody have a memory of why, or a reason to keep them? I don't use the 'instance' part. For manual testing I prefer using mkzopeinstance. The 'i18n*' parts provide an

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 CMF Tests Summarizer wrote: Test failures - Subject: FAILED (errors=13) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Tue Mar 30 21:52:10 EDT 2010 URL:

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tres Seaver wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: Hi Tres, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: I can't even get the trunk buildout to build this morning: Hanno, do you have any clue what is going on here? The

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Hanno Schlichting
2010/3/31 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com: I believe the root of this problem is that the 'index' and 'versions' bits of a buildout.cfg are effectively Highlanders (there can only be one).  I gave up on trying to get the two, two, two Zopes in one buildout to work, and instead created a

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hanno Schlichting wrote: 2010/3/31 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com: I believe the root of this problem is that the 'index' and 'versions' bits of a buildout.cfg are effectively Highlanders (there can only be one). I gave up on trying to get the

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: OK, the change I'm planning on the trunk essentially reverts your last commit (all the extra version pins to make the 'test-zope212' part build), plus deleting the test-zope212 part (see attached patch). Sure. That

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/31/10 20:33 , Tres Seaver wrote: I also don't know why the 'instance' and 'i18n*' parts are configured in these buildouts -- does somebody have a memory of why, or a reason to keep them? The instance part is a pure convenience to quickly fire

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 3/31/10 20:33 , Tres Seaver wrote: I also don't know why the 'instance' and 'i18n*' parts are configured in these buildouts -- does somebody have a memory of why, or a reason to keep them? The instance part is a pure

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/31/10 22:07 , Tres Seaver wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 3/31/10 20:33 , Tres Seaver wrote: I also don't know why the 'instance' and 'i18n*' parts are configured in these buildouts -- does somebody have a memory of why, or a reason to keep

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 3 OK, 1 Failed

2010-03-31 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 31.03.2010, 22:07 Uhr, schrieb Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com: The instance part is a pure convenience to quickly fire up an instance if I need to look at something in the ZMI while doing development. If there's no pressing reason to remove it I'd really like to keep it. I can see