The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope).
Assigned and Open
Brian
- "ZPT not being processed with text/vnd.wap.wml mime type",
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/968
Caseman
- "ZCTextUndex
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Apr 5 11:01:01 2005 UTC to Wed Apr 6 11:01:01 2005 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2_6-branch Python-2.1.3 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Tue Apr 5 22:43:07 EDT 2
The schedule for the next Zope release is a follows:
2.7.6 b1: April 13th
2.7.6 RC1: April 20th
2.7.6 final: April 27th
Although 2.7.5 had been relased lately, yesterdays hotfix and another bug
justify a new release this month.
Andreas
pgpUdi8AIHsLz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Anyone has enough knowledge about the zLOG changes in Zope 2.8 to give
a clue about why it's logging much more stuff to the console and the
output looks sooo different?
--
Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://awkly.org - dreamcatching :: making your dreams come true
http://www.enfoldsys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> Anyone has enough knowledge about the zLOG changes in Zope 2.8 to give
> a clue about why it's logging much more stuff to the console and the
> output looks sooo different?
Zope 2.8 uses the standard Python 'logger' module
On Apr 7, 2005, at 2:09, Tres Seaver wrote:
At "INFO" level, I think 2.8 logs even less than 2.7; "BLATHER" level
is a lot noiser, however. I have no earthly idea why we default the
logging level to "all" (but 2.7 did to); "INFO" is a much more
reasonable default.
Yes, that logging level "all" sh
