sn't allow you to
log out, for example.
So, in principal, invalid credentials should raise an error, but in
practice, you can't do that if you use Simple HTTP authentication.
With other authentication schemes, where you can log out properly,
it's would be possible.
--
Lennart Regebro
On 4/20/05, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
> >>Supposedly you would not be able to access that part of the site until
> >>you authenticate against it. Isn't that the case now?
> >
> > Assuming it requires authent
7;t also provide a method to consciously drop basic
> auth headers ;-)
Yet Another Crappy Standard.
> Well, I have to say I was really disappointed when I read the W3C specs
> for response codes. They freely interchange authentication and
> authorization,
On 7/22/05, Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If someone does a checkin but is not subscribed with the correct mail
> to the zope-checkins list, the checkin doesn't appear there.
>
> This sucks.
> A number of checkins have gone under the radar in the last few months.
>
> Could the ch
> Perhaps
> I should exclude the zope package as well. Or perhaps we shouldn't
> exclude anything by default.
No, exclude on. But an easy way to run everything would be nice...
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management http://www.c
