Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Bare except dangerous to ZODB? was Re: [Zope-dev] Accept-Charset hearders causing 500 internal server error.[correct but not lenient]

2003-02-12 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 11:04 pm, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 13:19, Shane Hathaway wrote: I'm thinking the veto should be added by Connection.commit() and Connection.setstate() whenever a conflict is about to propagate. What do you think? Maybe I don't

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Bare except dangerous to ZODB?

2003-02-12 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 5:21 pm, Jeremy Hylton wrote: On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 12:10, Shane Hathaway wrote: I'd like to do the transaction states, because it would keep the code in zodb3 and zodb4 similar. There are application-level reasons to mark a transaction as doomed, and I would

Re: [Zope-dev] Python core dump zope 2.6.1+CMF1.3

2003-02-12 Thread R. David Murray
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Barry Pederson wrote: Sounds like you need the THREAD_STACKS_SIZE patch for FreeBSD's Python 2.1 Well, the others seeing the problem are *not* running FreeBSD. I was able to confirm that one saw it with Windows2000. Not sure about the others at the moment. If you've

[Zope-dev] Multiple author and reviewer roles in Zope CMF

2003-02-12 Thread David Cain
I would like to apply Zope CMF to our organization which is made up of numerous departments. Each department has one or more managers (reviewers) and content providers. Also, some managers cross departments, as well as content providers. How can I create several Zope CMF roles (reviewer and

[Zope-dev] passing browserId value

2003-02-12 Thread Mario Bianchi
Hi list, I want to embed the browserId value in every link/button/clickable-item of the p ages in my site, so that users get a sessioned access without using cookies. How can I manage this task without having to manually rewrite the code of the pa ges served by the site? Some pages are the

Re: [Zope-dev] Multiple author and reviewer roles in Zope CMF

2003-02-12 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 13:27, David Cain wrote: I would like to apply Zope CMF to our organization which is made up of numerous departments. Each department has one or more managers (reviewers) and content providers. Also, some managers cross departments, as well as content providers.

Re: [Zope-dev] Multiple author and reviewer roles in Zope CMF

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Winkler
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 03:20:39PM -0200, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: Local Roles rule and should have more visible placement in the Security tab... I constantly forget that it exists :) While we're on the subject - are local roles acquired in subfolders? Hmm, maybe I should file that as

Re: [Zope-dev] Python core dump zope 2.6.1+CMF1.3

2003-02-12 Thread Andy McKay
Well, the others seeing the problem are *not* running FreeBSD. I was able to confirm that one saw it with Windows2000. Not sure about the others at the moment. Sorry mate, we've got ours (Win and Mac OS X) fixed. Our CMF was what out of whack with an attempted patch to FSObject.py. Our issue

Re: [Zope-dev] Multiple author and reviewer roles in Zope CMF

2003-02-12 Thread Adrian van den Dries
On February 12, Paul Winkler wrote: While we're on the subject - are local roles acquired in subfolders? Yes, to the point that globals roles are actually redundant, but serve as an optimisation of a local role at the same level as your userfolder. a. -- Adrian van den Dries

Re: [Zope-dev] Multiple author and reviewer roles in Zope CMF

2003-02-12 Thread Paul Winkler
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:14:18AM +1100, Adrian van den Dries wrote: On February 12, Paul Winkler wrote: While we're on the subject - are local roles acquired in subfolders? Yes, to the point that globals roles are actually redundant, but serve as an optimisation of a local role at the

Re: [Zope-dev] Python core dump zope 2.6.1+CMF1.3

2003-02-12 Thread Casey Duncan
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:20 am, R. David Murray wrote: [snip] I sup regularly, and rebuild regularly. That patch is already applied. Also, 2.2 appears to not need the patch, and it crashes, too. I can confirm that 2.2 does need to be configured with a larger stack size to work