[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Proposal: cvs to subversion transition May 11 (?)

2004-05-05 Thread Fred Drake
On Wednesday 05 May 2004 01:59 am, Jim Fulton wrote: I'm thinking of trying again to do the cvs to svn conversion of the main-line development branches (cvs heads) on Tusday May 11. This would entail moving ZODB, Zope 2, and Zope 3 head development to subversion (along with ZConfig,

[Zope-dev] Re: [ZODB-Dev] RFC: Multi-Databases

2004-05-05 Thread Toby Dickenson
(reply-to set to zodb-dev) In the long term, this will allow is to *finally* support cross database references. Your proposal describes an unfamiliar kind of reference. In unix filesystem terms, it mixes characteristics of hard links and symbolic links. Like hard links it directly references

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.X Session problems

2004-05-05 Thread Chris Withers
Kris Erickson wrote: Per this thread that seems to have been dropped (MaxTransientObjectsExceeded Error); This means more unique users have accessed your site than the maximum configured number of sessions. Go to the session data container objectin the the temp folder and tweak the config so

[Zope-dev] Re: Mailing Log Entries in 2.7

2004-05-05 Thread Chris Withers
Fred Drake wrote: That's not currently possible, though it wouldn't be hard to add. Perhaps some future ZConfig revision would add this. Surely ZConfig alredy allows this, it's just Zope's use of ZConfig that needs to support it? Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python

[Zope-dev] Re: Nightly Zope 3 Binary Compiles for WIndows

2004-05-05 Thread Chris Withers
Jim Fulton wrote: I'd be happy to set up a nightly (or weekly, let me know which would be better) scheduled task (see, it's Widnows, there is no Cron, although Schedules Tasks do have a much nicer UI ;-) ) that checked out he latest HEAD of Zope 3, compiled it and PUT it up to my Zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] Subversion

2004-05-05 Thread Chris Withers
Tim Peters wrote: svn's story is much better (perfect, in fact) when forgetting to add eol-style: regardless of which kind of platform did the commit, the property can be added after the fact by anyone, and svn will automatically repair working copies on all platforms. Because (most) svn

Re: [Zope-dev] Subversion

2004-05-05 Thread Lennart Regebro
Chris Withers wrote: Tim Peters wrote: svn's story is much better (perfect, in fact) when forgetting to add eol-style: regardless of which kind of platform did the commit, the property can be added after the fact by anyone, and svn will automatically repair working copies on all platforms.

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope 2.X Session problems

2004-05-05 Thread Tres Seaver
Chris Withers wrote: Kris Erickson wrote: Per this thread that seems to have been dropped (MaxTransientObjectsExceeded Error); This means more unique users have accessed your site than the maximum configured number of sessions. Go to the session data container objectin the the temp folder

Re: [ZODB-Dev] RE: [Zope-Coders] RE: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] ATTENTION! cvs tosubversion transitiontomorrow

2004-05-05 Thread Chris Withers
Tim Peters wrote: snip much pain and suffering This, btw, is why I prefer the: svn co https:// ...protocol. Will this be supported? cheers, Chris - who suddenly wonder how the hell you get https to use key-based auth :-S -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting -

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: cvs to subversion transition May 11 (?)

2004-05-05 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 02:59, Jim Fulton wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: [...] I'm thinking of trying again to do the cvs to svn conversion of the main-line development branches (cvs heads) on Tusday May 11. This would entail moving ZODB, Zope 2, and Zope 3 head development to subversion (along with

Re: [ZODB-Dev] RE: [Zope-Coders] RE: [Zope-dev] Re: ATTENTION! cvs tosubversion transitiontomorrow

2004-05-05 Thread Tres Seaver
Chris Withers wrote: Tim Peters wrote: snip much pain and suffering This, btw, is why I prefer the: svn co https:// ...protocol. Will this be supported? No. We discussed this already: the WebDAV stuff is slow, and has much weaker authentication semantics; it would also require us to go into

RE: [Zope-dev] Segfault and Deadlock

2004-05-05 Thread alangmead
Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/04/2004 08:18:52 PM: I don't think it should be tested for in configure (or at compile-time at all). People will want to have binary distributions that work both with LinuxThreads and NPTL; some people actually switch back and forth on an

[Zope-dev] Re: Mailing Log Entries in 2.7

2004-05-05 Thread Fred Drake
Regarding putting more information in email's generated using email-notifier sections, I wrote: That's not currently possible, though it wouldn't be hard to add. Perhaps some future ZConfig revision would add this. On Wednesday 05 May 2004 05:41 am, Chris Withers responded: Surely ZConfig

[Zope-dev] Re: Mailing Log Entries in 2.7

2004-05-05 Thread Chris Withers
Fred Drake wrote: The configuration of the logging is handled using a ZConfig component that's actually bundled with ZConfig itself on the Zope 2 head; it's in the package ZConfig.components.logger. This allows any project using ZConfig to use the same basic logging support; we actually have

[Zope-dev] getRoles()

2004-05-05 Thread Erik Myllymaki
I was fooling around in AccessControl\User.py, tying to add some user groups from an NT domain in the getRoles() method. Why does the getRoles() method get called so many times? Seems like once for each object on a page that needs authentication? Was making for a VERY slow page load while my

[Zope-dev] Re: Bug day report

2004-05-05 Thread Simon Michael
+1. This happens a bit on plone.org as well. Valid issues get rejected a bit too quickly when they should be left open or clarified further. Since the submitter is relatively powerless in these trackers there is a bad psychological effect. ___

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.X Session problems

2004-05-05 Thread Chris McDonough
The data object timeout value was what I needed. I'm afraid though that in this case I don't have a good answer for why they're not being expired. I will put looking into this on my todo list. On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 09:32, Alex V. Koval wrote: Hi Chris, On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:36:59 -0400,

[Zope-dev] Re: [ZODB-Dev] RFC: Multi-Databases

2004-05-05 Thread Jim Fulton
Toby Dickenson wrote: (reply-to set to zodb-dev) In the long term, this will allow is to *finally* support cross database references. Your proposal describes an unfamiliar kind of reference. In unix filesystem terms, it mixes characteristics of hard links and symbolic links. That's right,

[Zope-dev] Re: Nightly Zope 3 Binary Compiles for WIndows

2004-05-05 Thread Jim Fulton
Chris Withers wrote: Do you have to go through all of that? Couldn't you put it up as a zip file, using ZMI, rather than CMF API's? As a mere mortal member and not-yet-signer of litigious paperwork, am I allowed ZMI access? Sure. After you log in, you can still get to

RE: [Zope-dev] Re: Nightly Zope 3 Binary Compiles for WIndows

2004-05-05 Thread Tim Peters
[Jim] ... If they have the .pyd files, they can run Zope and fix problems they find in the .py files. They have the .pyd files now. I'm keeping them up to date, and Max M wrote a clear howto (which references the .pyd Zip files on zope.org):