Re: [Zope-dev] 100k+ objects, or...Improving Performance of BTreeFolder...

2001-12-10 Thread Phillip J. Eby
I'm not sure if this is taken into consideration in your work so far/future plans... but just in case you were unaware, it is not necessary for you to persistently store objects in the ZODB that you intend to index in a ZCatalog. All that is required is that the object to be cataloged is

Re: [Zope-dev] 100k+ objects, or...Improving Performance of BTreeFolder...

2001-12-10 Thread Chris McDonough
Excellent analysis, many thanks Sean! This is much-needed info for people whom are attempting to scale. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 10:36 PM Subject: [Zope-dev] 100k+ objects, or...Improving Performance

Re: [Zope-dev] 100k+ objects, or...Improving Performance of BTreeFolder...

2001-12-10 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 04:08 PM 12/10/01 +, Tony McDonald wrote: On 10/12/01 2:54 pm, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure if this is taken into consideration in your work so far/future plans... but just in case you were unaware, it is not necessary for you to persistently store objects

[Zope-dev] 100k+ objects, or...Improving Performance of BTreeFolder...

2001-12-09 Thread sean . upton
Interesting FYI for those looking to support lots of cataloged objects in ZODB and Zope (Chris W., et al)... I'm working on a project to put ~350k Cataloged objects (customer database) in a single BTreeFolder-derived container; these objects are 'proxy' objects which each expose a single record