Re: [Zope-dev] Objects with multiple parents and storage flexibility, ZPatterns?

2001-01-05 Thread Chris Withers
Steve Spicklemire wrote: No... I don't think so! If you don't mind keeping stuff in ZODB then you *could* have a traversal interface that made stuff 'appear' wherever you want it to, though its persistent storage would 'really' be in a Rack or FwCS. Cool... how would I go about doing that?

Re: [Zope-dev] Objects with multiple parents and storage flexibility, ZPatterns?

2001-01-04 Thread Chris Withers
Thanks... this sounds a lot like what I'm after :-) Steve Spicklemire wrote: I think that if you make your DataSkins folderish it will be hard to make the storage anything other than ZODB. Well, I don't mind the 'skins' being stored in the ZODB, but, as Steve A mentioned, I _would_ like

Re: [Zope-dev] Objects with multiple parents and storage flexibility, ZPatterns?

2001-01-04 Thread Steve Spicklemire
Hi Chris, "Chris" == Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Chris Steve Spicklemire wrote: I think that if you make your DataSkins folderish it will be hard to make the storage anything other than ZODB. Chris Well, I don't mind the 'skins' being stored in the ZODB,

[Zope-dev] Objects with multiple parents and storage flexibility, ZPatterns?

2001-01-03 Thread Chris Withers
Hi, Once again I'm back at trying to solve this problem, hopefully with a little more knowledge this time ;-) What I'd like: 'Zope' objects of type 'X', which can have multiple parents and can contain other objects of type 'X', where storage isn't necessarily tied to the ZODB but where the

Re: [Zope-dev] Objects with multiple parents and storage flexibility, ZPatterns?

2001-01-03 Thread Steve Spicklemire
Hi Chris, Random thoughts follow. ;-) I think that if you make your DataSkins folderish it will be hard to make the storage anything other than ZODB. However, Steve Alexander posted a neat trick the other day where __bobo_traverse__ is supplied by an attribute provider. You could use this

Re: [Zope-dev] Objects with multiple parents and storage flexibility, ZPatterns?

2001-01-03 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 05:15 PM 1/3/01 +, Chris Withers wrote: What I'd like: 'Zope' objects of type 'X', which can have multiple parents and can contain other objects of type 'X', where storage isn't necessarily tied to the ZODB but where the objects have a normal properties page (in terms of use, again, it'd