Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2001-01-03 Thread Jim Fulton
Chris Withers wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: - Policies to control whether multiple revisions are stored or whether revisions are removed by packing on a object-by-object or transaction-by-transaction basis. You could keep significant historical revisions for important

Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2001-01-02 Thread Chris Withers
Jim Fulton wrote: - Policies to control whether multiple revisions are stored or whether revisions are removed by packing on a object-by-object or transaction-by-transaction basis. You could keep significant historical revisions for important objects, such as Wiki pages,

Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2000-11-30 Thread Jim Fulton
Lalo Martins wrote: Well, two betas of OracleStorage in one day, then a month and a half of silence. What's the status? From our perspective, it's what it was then. We built it for a customer who later decided they didn't want it. I'm glad to hear you found it useful. What about the other

Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2000-11-30 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 08:10 AM 11/30/00 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: I don't think Data.fs will go away. I do expect it to be relagated to initial evaluation and development projects. Use of Berkely DB in transactional mode requires a significant andminstration commitment. Log files need to be purged. Backup and

Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2000-11-30 Thread Jim Fulton
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote: At 08:10 AM 11/30/00 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: I don't think Data.fs will go away. I do expect it to be relagated to initial evaluation and development projects. Use of Berkely DB in transactional mode requires a significant andminstration commitment. Log files

Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2000-11-30 Thread Lalo Martins
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:10:15AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: Lalo Martins wrote: Please help stamp out Data.fs! :-) I don't think Data.fs will go away. I do expect it to be relagated to initial evaluation and development projects. Use of Berkely DB in transactional mode requires a

Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2000-11-29 Thread Chris McDonough
ECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 9:01 PM Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others Lalo Martins wrote: Well, two betas of OracleStorage in one day, then a month and a half of silence. What's the status? What about the other Storage projects? BerkeleyStorage has been dea

Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2000-11-29 Thread Chris McDonough
Of course it would, for the same reasons as OracleStorage (eg FileStorage/Data.fs is inefficient) Actually, it's the other way around. OracleStorage is 30-to-50 times slower than FileStorage on writes. Reads are slow too but the slowness is somewhat negated by caching.

Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2000-11-29 Thread Lalo Martins
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 07:02:50AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: Of course it would, for the same reasons as OracleStorage (eg FileStorage/Data.fs is inefficient) Actually, it's the other way around. OracleStorage is 30-to-50 times slower than FileStorage on writes. Reads are slow too

Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2000-11-29 Thread Lalo Martins
a report to the list. - Original Message - From: "Lalo Martins" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 8:42 AM Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 07:02:50AM -0500, Chris McDon

[Zope-dev] BerkeleyStorage (Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others)

2000-11-29 Thread Lalo Martins
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 04:28:26PM +, Ty Sarna wrote: Lalo Martins wrote: What about the other Storage projects? BerkeleyStorage has been dead for an year. It's not dead, it's just pining for the fjords! Seriously, AFAIK it still works, and it's mainly just stalled waiting for

Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2000-11-28 Thread Ender
Lalo Martins wrote: Well, two betas of OracleStorage in one day, then a month and a half of silence. What's the status? What about the other Storage projects? BerkeleyStorage has been dead for an year, and I heard pretty nasty words about InterbaseStorage. What about someone who wanted

Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2000-11-28 Thread Lalo Martins
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 06:01:15PM -0800, Ender wrote: Lalo Martins wrote: Well, two betas of OracleStorage in one day, then a month and a half of silence. What's the status? What about the other Storage projects? BerkeleyStorage has been dead for an year, and I heard pretty nasty

[Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

2000-11-13 Thread Lalo Martins
Well, two betas of OracleStorage in one day, then a month and a half of silence. What's the status? What about the other Storage projects? BerkeleyStorage has been dead for an year, and I heard pretty nasty words about InterbaseStorage. What about someone who wanted to try to port OracleStorage